I have no idea what that is. Plus, Jon, don't shoot the messanger. Walker is furthering the idea that UA 175 didn't crash into WTC. Not me. I'm just sifting the net, looking for something tasty.

Plus, Jon, from that jpg, that debris could be from about 20+ different makes of airliner. That could indeed be part of a Boeing but how the hell do you and I know it came from UA 11, or 175. It may be from a Boeing from a Raytheon boneyard that was used as a drone and flown into tower 1. FAA radar operators were requesting scrambled jets to go after UA 11 up to 10 minutes after it supposedly hit tower 1. They thought it was still hijacked and flying south towards D.C. They probably thought this because the blip they thought was UA 11 was showing up on their radars as it headed south towards D.C. In fact, it was the Port Authority who called the FAA and told them to spread the word that it was UA 11 that hit tower 1. But some at the FAA didn't get the Port Authority's message and kept asking for jets to go after UA 11 as it cruised over the Atlantic towards D.C. (Paul Thompson's "Terror Timeline," found in book form or online at http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/ )

And as far as I know, Walker isn't even saying that a plane didn't hit tower 1. He IS arguing that FBI COINTELPRO hologram technology was used to make it appear that UA 175 hit tower 2.

Is he right? Hell if I know.

All I know is that you now have an Amtrac electrical engineer who witnessed the Pentagon crash and was on-scene helping victims. He says that it was a "global hawk" that hit the Pentagon, that it wasn't UA 77 and that he smelled cordite while on the scene trying to help. http://total411.info/