9/11 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77
This pretty much puts the argument to rest as far as I'm concerned.
Just out of curiosity, If I were to show you a animation of how both the north and south wtc towers collapsed due to the panckaing of floors. Would that clear up any controlled demolition theories?
Edit: I know I stir.
No, but the vanishing "fin" that they focused on was a pretty compelling argument.
Which side does it put to rest? It almost looks to me as if a plane did hit there. Before you get all nuts, lemme say that it does not quantify what type of plane, or who was on it.Originally Posted by Gold9472
The "no-plane" at the Pentagon argument.
Personally I dont think that quelled any theories.
Like I said, to me that "animation" is no different then if one were presented fully explaining the wtc towers collapsing from the pancaking of floors.
Again, I think we go back to the issue of the pentagon being the administrations smoking gun just waiting to totally debunk the 9/11 truth movement.
Why release an animation when they have video from the sheraton hotel and citgo gas stations?
It aint going happen.
Well I think you're a doo-doo head.
That argument is just as valuable as the Flight 77/No Flight 77 argument.
I agree completely.Originally Posted by Gold9472
I see no conclusive evidence on either side that suggests exactly what hit the pentagon.
I look at the evidence, I gather from it what I can. At this time, im not certain as to what type of plane hit the pentagon. However, based on what I have learned, it doesnt look like it was a 757.
What I am certain of is, that an arab terrorist with little piloting skills, did not fly a 757 into the pentagon as the "official" story suggests.
You're still a doo-doo head.