Quote Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
The wargames would be the biggest piece of evidence as well as Bush's staged actions that day, the fact that Marvin Bush worked for the security company which handled the WTC and that whole thing. And so on and so on....

As far the heist analogy goes, yeah it's important to figure out who did what and get the complete picture, but when your even an accessory to the murder of 3,000 people, your in deep shit. If you drove the getaway car for someone who just killed that many people, it's wont exactly be the same sentence as driving for a small bank robbery.
The evidence you are talking about is circumstantial. Yes, this - and many other facts - are strong circumstantial evidence. I have yet to see any direct evidence, though.

As for who gets how much shit - with charges like that no one is gonna' get a small amount, that for sure. Yet I still insist we ought to resist temptation to even mentally convict people without sufficient evidence - regardless of how much we dmight etest those people.