Well, I tried talking to someone in another forum about WTC 7, and the replies I got were that:
a) Popular Mechanics explains WTC 7
b) It doesn't matter if Michael Chertoff's cousin was the editor, because PM presents facts.
c) We don't want to read the 911review link you gave us that refutes PM's article. (not explicitly stated)
d) Popular Mechanics still explains WTC 7
Anyone else had similar, better, or worse experiences talking about Popular Mechanics?