I found a tidbit while googling that came up via FOX, of all places, that stated he'd said it on Hardball with Chris Matthews, or Chris Matthews covered it, I'm not sure. The article won't come up when I click the link, it just directs me into FOX's search listing of random things relative to Max Cleland, but nothing about the article.Originally Posted by Gold9472
Weird.
Tired...
Wherever it's from, I WISH I had the audio/video of it.
I know what you mean.
I want the video of this: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...18/pzn.01.html
In it, there's they guy talking about having regretted letting Atta through the gates to board the plane because he felt something tell him they were terrorists, what was strange though, was the difference between what he saw in real life, and what he later saw on the video...
From the transcript:
Once he and other employees realized what was happening, they called the FBI. And within hours, Touhey found himself viewing this videotape of the two Arab men he had ticketed pass going through security. He told the FBI who they were. He also told them that he observed something curious on the tape.
TOUHEY: And they said, "What do you mean?" I said, "Well, these guys had on -- they were very business looking. They had on ties and jackets." And I said, "If you look at these guys, they both have like open collar, they have like dress shirts with an open collar." I said, "But that's them."
apprently, the look on Touhey's face when saying this was pretty strained, like he didn't know what going on, or like he knew what was going on, and was scared of what might happen to him for saying this.
I'm suprised you still listen to O & A after that appearance.
sounds like we could have used Cleland on the commission. I understand why he wouldn't want to play a part in that considering how discusted he was with how they were running things,but he could've played watch dog and spilled all the wrongs he discovered. i don't know, that is just the first thought that came to mind after hearing about him and his resigning. i had no knowledge of him before. i am glad that he said what he said though instead of simply resigning and not speaking his mind. does anyone know if he is still suspicious of the "official story"?
Thats exactly what I was thinking when I read about the 'wired' buildings. They DID drop a building even though no plane hit it. The key is, if the MSM NEVER EVER EVER EVER reports on it, then noone knowls about bldg 7. If you ask pretty much anyone how many buildings fell on 9/11 they will tell you 2. Gold, I but if you ask Norton how many, he will say 2. If he says 3, then I would like to hear his explanation for how it fell with no plane hitting it.
Tired...
He hasn't responded to my Mineta email yet... if he will at all.
yep...that's usually what happens. the Mineta testimony is check and mate in most debates.
Tired...
There's no rebuttal to it. None whatsoever. You can't argue it. You can't "debate" it. It's one of the most incriminating pieces of information we as a movement have that almost 100% proves complicity. At the very least, it proves there is a coverup, and that they're deliberately trying to protect Cheney specifically.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote