once the WMDs are found, for the US to have credibility backing the claims of the find, they would have to be turned over to international inspectors. Tracing a nuke back to its source is stupid-simple if you know what to look for. In the end, you run the risk of the IAEA saying, these nukes were made in Oak Ridge 15 years ago December, not in Iraq. Imagine how that would look. You would be giving the world a indisputable reason to unite against you.

Remember, the CIA, MIA, NSA, FBI, all employ some brainiacs. They also employ the same caliber of bumbling fool that can be found working other jobs in the private sect. In other words, don't expect them to do anything super sophisticated. When they do, it is not people but computers behind it. This is part of the reason why you don't really need to be too afraid of these guys as you explore the truth about them. They make mistakes. They don't cover their tracks. They are lazy, myopic, selfish; their agencies are prone to splintering, differing allegiances and ideologies, on and on. Yeah, they pulled of 911, but they made many mistakes in doing so and without the help of the gov't and without a whole lot of evidence, members of the rabble like you and I are able to blast enormous holes in the official story.

In short, it isn't nearly a David v. Goliath scenario.