T
Terral
Guest
Greetings to All:
This post contains a recent letter to the New York Police Department filing an official complaint against the true terrorists behind the 9/11 attacks, but with my personal information omitted and picture linking changed to actual pictures for easier reading. The more I investigate the evidence from the 9/11 attacks, the more it dawns on me that New York’s Finest were used as pawns in a deadly charade that destroyed over 3000 American lives and is continuing to kill even more.
NYPD:
My name is Terral L. Croft ( http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php ) and I am the son of a General Contractor who is also the son of a General Contractor with decades of experience in building demolition and construction. Much of my free time, since the fifth anniversary of 9/11, has been spent gathering and assimilating data on those attacks and the discrepancies between the evidence and the Official Bush Administration Cover Stories. I am drafting this letter in the minutes after making my request for a contact and email address on Saturday April 28th, 2007, but with anticipation of being read by a very skeptical audience. After all, the NYPD has been on the case for over five years, so who is this guy to be contacting you in the first place? I understand that you must receive messages like this all the time, but I must ask you to please put away your defenses for a few minutes to examine the evidence very carefully and decide for yourselves. There is a truckload of ‘disinformation’ out there clouding the judgment of Americans on these 9/11 topics, that you must recognize and purge from your mental environment for this waking-up process to have any impact whatsoever.
Please allow me to begin with the cases of Flight 93 (Shanksville) and Flight 77 (Pentagon), before focusing in on the evidence relating to WTC-7 and the Twin Towers attacks. While this presentation is prepared for the skeptical reader, I must also expect that you have some expertise in weighing the evidence to separate fact from fiction. Therefore, we must concentrate and focus on the evidence and not upon our own preconceived notions engrained in our minds by the Media.
http://911review.org/93/maps/
Go through all of the pictures to realize no 100-ton Jetliner ever crashed in the field outside of Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Nobody on earth can show you the 60 tons of high grade aluminum, the two multi-ton Rolls Royce Engines, fuselage, seats, cargo, tail section or anything else, because no Jetliner ever crashed here. Use your own search engine to try and locate a single picture of crashed Jetliner looking anything like the real deal:
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/othercrashes.html
When you are thoroughly convinced that no 100-ton Jetliner crashed anywhere near Shanksville, then examine the evidence for Flight 77 supposedly crashing into the Pentagon:
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/details.html
The top link is to the official website and the Photobucket links are to my own archive of the evidence. I am forced to use the Photobucket account, because these websites oftentimes restrict the linking to their pictures. None of the original pictures have been altered in any way, unless otherwise noted in a demonstration. This ‘impact scale’ picture shows the West Wedge “E-Ring” wall of the Pentagon, after the fire was extinguished the first time, but before the second and subsequent floors have fallen. Note that only two windows from the second floor are destroyed completely and that some of the windows in direct proximity to those remain unbroken. The most important items in this picture are the cable spools standing in front of the E-Ring wall. The distance from the tops of those cable spools to the bottom of the still intact second floor is only about seven feet! Note the three orange columns bent back in our direction and away from the original blast zone located inside the white circle. How did an almost 50-foot tall and 125-foot wide 100-ton Jetliner pass over those cable spools and under the second floor and leave those columns standing? Do the firemen look concerned about saving anyone from the 100-ton Jetliner? No! Look carefully at the green lawn for any sign of Jetliner debris and you will find none.
Here is another shot of the same picture that shows the West Wedge wall still very much intact and nothing on the lawn at all. How did 100 tons of Jetliner pass into that wall? You should be able to see that is very much impossible. The Official Bush Administration Cover Story says 100 tons of jetliner vaporized into thin air, before even striking the Pentagon, but take an even closer look at the cable spools:
The amount of energy required to vaporize 60 tons of high grade aluminum, the twin Rolls Royce engines and everything else is astronomical. So how does kerosene vaporize the Jetliner, but the black plastic covering is still on these spools?? Do you see any melted aluminum anywhere? No! You are looking at the aftermath of a Tomahawk Missile attack, which left the ‘inside’ of the Pentagon burning red hot (over cable spools), but the West Wedge wall shielded these spools from the initial blast; which tipped two of those spools back in our direction with the three bent columns. Donald Rumsfeld told Parade Magazine that this damage was done by a ‘missile’ on the day after 9/11.
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Missile-Not-Flight-77.html
This brings us to the five ‘official’ frames released by the Pentagon (running beside Rumsfeld’s words shaded in yellow) showing their version of the Jetliner. These five frames show that Donald Rumsfeld’s original statements to Parade were indeed correct AND the Official Bush Administration Cover Story of today is a LIE. Watch the little running video over and over again to recognize the ‘white vapor trail’ common to Tomahawk Missiles. Please follow along in this little exercise to gain the full impact of what you are really looking at:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/fiveframes.html
This is the first frame showing our flying object entering the screen on the far right in direct line with the top of the right hand column. These construction cones are made at 28 inches to conform to DOT specifications. We can use that information to calculate the height of the right hand column to be just about 5 feet in elevation above the ground. Then sight the horizon in the distance to realize our camera elevation is being held parallel to the ground at that 5 foot elevation. Run your eyes across the top of the right hand column to also realize the flying object is ‘centered’ at precisely the same 5 foot height above the ground. Then measure the distance between the ground and the center of the flying object to realize that distance is a bit over twice the diameter of the flying object itself. In other words, our flying object in this picture cannot be greater than just under 2 feet in diameter, which just happens to be the size of a Tomahawk Missile ( http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html#_SLCM )! Note the distorted characteristics of the white flying object (frame 1 pic) entering the right hand of the picture to realize it is traveling at about the speed of sound and creating a ‘bow shockwave’ that is distorting the air around it. The missile is transferring energy from the engine to the bow shockwave, which extended out on both sides and knocked down these light poles along the trajectory heading:
This missile descended from 7000 feet to make a 270 degree turn and strike the only section of the Pentagon to be renovated with a sprinkler system in just about 2 and a half minutes like this:
Even our elite fighter pilots cannot make this hairpin turn and descend over a mile and fly just above the ground in a 100-ton Jetliner Pig! Instead of being under 2 feet in diameter, a real picture of a Boeing 757-200 Jetliner should look more like this:
When you raise the entire Jetliner up to pass over the tops of those cable spools, then we are already very much into the third floor, which does not even begin to account for the tail section standing almost 50 feet above the tarmac. There is no government requisition for removing over 60 tons of aluminum from either of these crash sites, because there was never any Jetliner crash in either case. The Pentagon is protected by five highly sophisticated missile batteries that had to be turned off from the ‘inside’ for this kind of attack to even take place. Dick Eastman’s assessments on Rumsfeld’s involvement tell the story:
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman/rumsfeld.htm
Jamie McIntire, the chief Pentagon Correspondent from CNN gave his “No Plane” testimony from in front of the Pentagon on 9/11:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/index.html
This leads us to the WTC-7 cases that do fall within the jurisdiction of the New York Police Department.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WTC7_Collapse.mpg
Hold your cursor on the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down again and again to realize the center of the building is collapsing ahead of the two sides. The Official Bush Administration Cover Story says falling debris from WTC-1 traveled over 350 feet to impact WTC-7, which caused a chain reaction that caused the entire 47 story steel skyscraper to come tumbling down into its own footprint. That claim is not only ridiculous and supported by none of the evidence, but it is very much impossible; as no steel skyscraper in the history of this planet has fallen down due to fire, before or since 9/11. The problem with the Official Cover Story is that building fires burn at around 800 degrees ( http://www.schwabcorp.com/faqs.htm = #8), while the steel columns and beams in WTC-7 begin melting at 2800 degrees. WTC-7 was designed and built using ‘Compartmentalization’ of all supporting beams and columns, which eliminated ‘fire’ as a probable cause:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/WTC_ch5.htm
The beams were separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically, which does not even account for the 3-hour ‘spray-on’ fireproofing on all the columns and those encased in gypsum wallboard. Any ‘fuel source’ would run out long before penetrating these safety features, as the typical building fire burns in a single location for an average of only 20 minutes.
Take a long look at the steel framework we are talking about and try to imagine how any number of building fires could reduce that into this . . .
. . . in just a matter of hours. The energy required for severing all of these supporting columns, girders and beams simultaneously is off the charts! There is simply no way for ‘all’ of the compartments to become penetrated by any ‘fire’ that could cause the catastrophic failure of ‘all’ the supporting beams and columns at the very same time. The only way this is made possible is through ‘controlled demolition’ and evidence for that is everywhere in WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7!!
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/240406thermiteidentified.htm
If you are not aware of the destructive properties of ‘termite’ and how this compound is used in controlled demolition, then take a little time and watch these demonstrations.
[font="]
The American Free Press writer Christopher Bollyn’s ‘discusses the evidence’ commentary is attached to the picture of the NY Firemen standing among the fallen supporting columns. Direct your attention to the column just above the head of the fireman facing us:
This is a cut from that picture used to make this demonstration: Note the “Termite Residue” flowing on the ‘outside’ and ‘inside’ of the massive column with the 45-degree ‘shaped charge’ cut.
[/font][font="] [Continued][/font]
This post contains a recent letter to the New York Police Department filing an official complaint against the true terrorists behind the 9/11 attacks, but with my personal information omitted and picture linking changed to actual pictures for easier reading. The more I investigate the evidence from the 9/11 attacks, the more it dawns on me that New York’s Finest were used as pawns in a deadly charade that destroyed over 3000 American lives and is continuing to kill even more.
NYPD:
My name is Terral L. Croft ( http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php ) and I am the son of a General Contractor who is also the son of a General Contractor with decades of experience in building demolition and construction. Much of my free time, since the fifth anniversary of 9/11, has been spent gathering and assimilating data on those attacks and the discrepancies between the evidence and the Official Bush Administration Cover Stories. I am drafting this letter in the minutes after making my request for a contact and email address on Saturday April 28th, 2007, but with anticipation of being read by a very skeptical audience. After all, the NYPD has been on the case for over five years, so who is this guy to be contacting you in the first place? I understand that you must receive messages like this all the time, but I must ask you to please put away your defenses for a few minutes to examine the evidence very carefully and decide for yourselves. There is a truckload of ‘disinformation’ out there clouding the judgment of Americans on these 9/11 topics, that you must recognize and purge from your mental environment for this waking-up process to have any impact whatsoever.
Please allow me to begin with the cases of Flight 93 (Shanksville) and Flight 77 (Pentagon), before focusing in on the evidence relating to WTC-7 and the Twin Towers attacks. While this presentation is prepared for the skeptical reader, I must also expect that you have some expertise in weighing the evidence to separate fact from fiction. Therefore, we must concentrate and focus on the evidence and not upon our own preconceived notions engrained in our minds by the Media.
http://911review.org/93/maps/

Go through all of the pictures to realize no 100-ton Jetliner ever crashed in the field outside of Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Nobody on earth can show you the 60 tons of high grade aluminum, the two multi-ton Rolls Royce Engines, fuselage, seats, cargo, tail section or anything else, because no Jetliner ever crashed here. Use your own search engine to try and locate a single picture of crashed Jetliner looking anything like the real deal:
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/othercrashes.html

When you are thoroughly convinced that no 100-ton Jetliner crashed anywhere near Shanksville, then examine the evidence for Flight 77 supposedly crashing into the Pentagon:
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pent1/details.html

The top link is to the official website and the Photobucket links are to my own archive of the evidence. I am forced to use the Photobucket account, because these websites oftentimes restrict the linking to their pictures. None of the original pictures have been altered in any way, unless otherwise noted in a demonstration. This ‘impact scale’ picture shows the West Wedge “E-Ring” wall of the Pentagon, after the fire was extinguished the first time, but before the second and subsequent floors have fallen. Note that only two windows from the second floor are destroyed completely and that some of the windows in direct proximity to those remain unbroken. The most important items in this picture are the cable spools standing in front of the E-Ring wall. The distance from the tops of those cable spools to the bottom of the still intact second floor is only about seven feet! Note the three orange columns bent back in our direction and away from the original blast zone located inside the white circle. How did an almost 50-foot tall and 125-foot wide 100-ton Jetliner pass over those cable spools and under the second floor and leave those columns standing? Do the firemen look concerned about saving anyone from the 100-ton Jetliner? No! Look carefully at the green lawn for any sign of Jetliner debris and you will find none.

Here is another shot of the same picture that shows the West Wedge wall still very much intact and nothing on the lawn at all. How did 100 tons of Jetliner pass into that wall? You should be able to see that is very much impossible. The Official Bush Administration Cover Story says 100 tons of jetliner vaporized into thin air, before even striking the Pentagon, but take an even closer look at the cable spools:

The amount of energy required to vaporize 60 tons of high grade aluminum, the twin Rolls Royce engines and everything else is astronomical. So how does kerosene vaporize the Jetliner, but the black plastic covering is still on these spools?? Do you see any melted aluminum anywhere? No! You are looking at the aftermath of a Tomahawk Missile attack, which left the ‘inside’ of the Pentagon burning red hot (over cable spools), but the West Wedge wall shielded these spools from the initial blast; which tipped two of those spools back in our direction with the three bent columns. Donald Rumsfeld told Parade Magazine that this damage was done by a ‘missile’ on the day after 9/11.
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Missile-Not-Flight-77.html

This brings us to the five ‘official’ frames released by the Pentagon (running beside Rumsfeld’s words shaded in yellow) showing their version of the Jetliner. These five frames show that Donald Rumsfeld’s original statements to Parade were indeed correct AND the Official Bush Administration Cover Story of today is a LIE. Watch the little running video over and over again to recognize the ‘white vapor trail’ common to Tomahawk Missiles. Please follow along in this little exercise to gain the full impact of what you are really looking at:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/fiveframes.html

This is the first frame showing our flying object entering the screen on the far right in direct line with the top of the right hand column. These construction cones are made at 28 inches to conform to DOT specifications. We can use that information to calculate the height of the right hand column to be just about 5 feet in elevation above the ground. Then sight the horizon in the distance to realize our camera elevation is being held parallel to the ground at that 5 foot elevation. Run your eyes across the top of the right hand column to also realize the flying object is ‘centered’ at precisely the same 5 foot height above the ground. Then measure the distance between the ground and the center of the flying object to realize that distance is a bit over twice the diameter of the flying object itself. In other words, our flying object in this picture cannot be greater than just under 2 feet in diameter, which just happens to be the size of a Tomahawk Missile ( http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html#_SLCM )! Note the distorted characteristics of the white flying object (frame 1 pic) entering the right hand of the picture to realize it is traveling at about the speed of sound and creating a ‘bow shockwave’ that is distorting the air around it. The missile is transferring energy from the engine to the bow shockwave, which extended out on both sides and knocked down these light poles along the trajectory heading:

This missile descended from 7000 feet to make a 270 degree turn and strike the only section of the Pentagon to be renovated with a sprinkler system in just about 2 and a half minutes like this:

Even our elite fighter pilots cannot make this hairpin turn and descend over a mile and fly just above the ground in a 100-ton Jetliner Pig! Instead of being under 2 feet in diameter, a real picture of a Boeing 757-200 Jetliner should look more like this:

When you raise the entire Jetliner up to pass over the tops of those cable spools, then we are already very much into the third floor, which does not even begin to account for the tail section standing almost 50 feet above the tarmac. There is no government requisition for removing over 60 tons of aluminum from either of these crash sites, because there was never any Jetliner crash in either case. The Pentagon is protected by five highly sophisticated missile batteries that had to be turned off from the ‘inside’ for this kind of attack to even take place. Dick Eastman’s assessments on Rumsfeld’s involvement tell the story:
http://www.bedoper.com/eastman/rumsfeld.htm
Jamie McIntire, the chief Pentagon Correspondent from CNN gave his “No Plane” testimony from in front of the Pentagon on 9/11:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/index.html
This leads us to the WTC-7 cases that do fall within the jurisdiction of the New York Police Department.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WTC7_Collapse.mpg
Hold your cursor on the round scrollbar and move WTC-7 up and down again and again to realize the center of the building is collapsing ahead of the two sides. The Official Bush Administration Cover Story says falling debris from WTC-1 traveled over 350 feet to impact WTC-7, which caused a chain reaction that caused the entire 47 story steel skyscraper to come tumbling down into its own footprint. That claim is not only ridiculous and supported by none of the evidence, but it is very much impossible; as no steel skyscraper in the history of this planet has fallen down due to fire, before or since 9/11. The problem with the Official Cover Story is that building fires burn at around 800 degrees ( http://www.schwabcorp.com/faqs.htm = #8), while the steel columns and beams in WTC-7 begin melting at 2800 degrees. WTC-7 was designed and built using ‘Compartmentalization’ of all supporting beams and columns, which eliminated ‘fire’ as a probable cause:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/WTC_ch5.htm

The beams were separated by solid concrete slabs horizontally and curtain walls vertically, which does not even account for the 3-hour ‘spray-on’ fireproofing on all the columns and those encased in gypsum wallboard. Any ‘fuel source’ would run out long before penetrating these safety features, as the typical building fire burns in a single location for an average of only 20 minutes.

Take a long look at the steel framework we are talking about and try to imagine how any number of building fires could reduce that into this . . .

. . . in just a matter of hours. The energy required for severing all of these supporting columns, girders and beams simultaneously is off the charts! There is simply no way for ‘all’ of the compartments to become penetrated by any ‘fire’ that could cause the catastrophic failure of ‘all’ the supporting beams and columns at the very same time. The only way this is made possible is through ‘controlled demolition’ and evidence for that is everywhere in WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-7!!
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/240406thermiteidentified.htm
If you are not aware of the destructive properties of ‘termite’ and how this compound is used in controlled demolition, then take a little time and watch these demonstrations.

[font="]
The American Free Press writer Christopher Bollyn’s ‘discusses the evidence’ commentary is attached to the picture of the NY Firemen standing among the fallen supporting columns. Direct your attention to the column just above the head of the fireman facing us:

This is a cut from that picture used to make this demonstration: Note the “Termite Residue” flowing on the ‘outside’ and ‘inside’ of the massive column with the 45-degree ‘shaped charge’ cut.
[/font][font="] [Continued][/font]