That Cleveland airport mystery has always intrigued me, but I never looked into it. It does kind of fit the bumble planes theory where all the passengers were loaded onto '93 somewhere, maybe it was in Cleveland.
Printable View
That Cleveland airport mystery has always intrigued me, but I never looked into it. It does kind of fit the bumble planes theory where all the passengers were loaded onto '93 somewhere, maybe it was in Cleveland.
Interesting.
The Cleveland Airport Mystery has been discussed for a long time. Szymanski often "reveals" new information that has come out long before but seems to forget to source the original reference...
Here's a link to the source of the 'original' compilation resource re. Cleveland Mystery, as far as I know, which credits Team8+ with the research: http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modul...p?storyid=1008
I don't know... there are certainly a lot of unanswered questions here...
MY THEORY: In order for the Govt theory to work and for them to attack first afghan then iraq all of the Plane passengers had to die, no one could stop any of the first 3 hits because they were drone planes. The Passengers on 11,175 and 77 were all flown to Cleveland and all were transferred to 93 The Pennsylvania crash (93) might have contained all the passengers from 11,175,77 that would give them the fragmented unidentifiable bodies where dna could be obtained from each and every person the 93 crash site. I am still studying this, I am currently looking up the size/capacity of 93 and how many total victims combined from all 4 flights. The passenger list should hold some clues also checking into who's collected those Govt checks to not sue the airlines.Quote:
Originally Posted by somebigguy
The official story is all centered around It was reported that all 3 planes had been hijacked
This theory seems believable because of the fact that the pentagon was not hit by a 747, but what appears to be a small aircraft. Also, some sites suggest that the planes that hit the WTC were not 747's. The best reason as to why planes would need to be switched would problably be that they had to use remote control planes because hitting the WTC is difficult, and hitting the pentagon is a nearly impossible shot.
OK, but do we really believe that 93 actually went down in pennsylvania? where literally nothing was left to be found other than a funny looking whole in the ground without plane debris.... just have a hard time with that whole 93/pennsylvania thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by aceace
Hey Ace, that is the bumble plane theory exactly. The passengers on each of the flights were kept low somehow to ensure that they could all fit on one plane. Then each of the real planes were told over the radio that there was some "terrorist threat" and they should turn off their transponders and land at an airport somewhere, possibly Cleveland.Quote:
Originally Posted by aceace
Since the transponders were turned off, the real flights could be easily switched with the drones, a la Operation Northwoods, and sent on their way. The passengers are all herded onto a plane and blown up or shot down over Pennsylvania.
Operation Northwoods describes painting up a jet to look like a commercial flyer, and switching the planes with drones mid flight, so its not so far fetched. Because of Operation Northwoods, we have to strongly consider the possibility that this is what happened on 9/11. It explains why transponders were turned off, as well as the scenic routes and extremely sharp turns all planes took en route to their destinations.
If you wanna read about the bumble planes, here is a link:
http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html
Hey PG, flight 77 disappeared from radar up in W. Virginia I believe, so whatever hit the Pentagon wasn't 77, period. I suspect only 11 and 175 were switched with drones, and something was launched much closer to the Pentagon about 30 minutes later when the official story claims 77 suddenly appeared back on radar.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
Also, whatever hit the Pentagon came in on that impossible angle to ensure it wasn't taken out by the anti-aircraft system installed at the Pentagon.
Thats a tough one, but witnesses do claim to have seen a plane that day followed by an explosion of some sort. Witnesses also claim to have seen a second plane in the area which may have been responsible for detonating a bomb, shooting them down, or remote controlling them into the ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by amman254
One of the witnesses say the plane went straight up and then went into a nose dive, I bet this was actually remote control, then as it was coming down a bomb was detonated to ensure there were no distinguishing characteristics left. The hole in the ground may have been pre-existing, dug for this specific purpose.
ok bigguy, witnesses claim to have seen...about as many different things as there were on witnesses that day in pennsylvnia. we've discussed this almost into the ground at a german forum i visit, and basically, still no general consensus.Quote:
Originally Posted by somebigguy
one thing about your suggestion..."if" the plane was brought to explosion above ground, or still in the air, they would have been recovering parts, pieces, and bodies, all the way from there to hell and back, and not just have that neat empty "little" hole, that was easy for them to fence off within a couple of miles, and not let any photographers in. this would not have been the case if a 757 had crashed in there, or had been blown up in the air.
to the link from global free press, that was posted earlier, here is another one, that is not just a time line...
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modul...hp?storyid=323