I'm Going To Watch Loose Change...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gold9472

BTW... I love my little "Pod People". :)

---

are there pod ppl here? i wouldnt mind arguing about it if it was a calm and serious discussion.. unfortunately those discussions never are..

ive done a good bit of analysis on the footage myself, but never put together any sort of writeup or arguement against the pod because certain people would take such a writeup as an attack and not just an opinion..

anyone want to take the 'pro' side if i take the 'con' side?

:liverd:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dazinith

you havent watched Jeff King (MIT grad) on the theory of demolition from the reopen911 DVD.. ;)

http://www.reopen911.org/video/cte_07.mov

just messin with ya :)

---

I haven't seen any of those reopen 911 vids, I ordered mine months ago and never received it. Are they any good????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dazinith

are there pod ppl here? i wouldnt mind arguing about it if it was a calm and serious discussion.. unfortunately those discussions never are..

ive done a good bit of analysis on the footage myself, but never put together any sort of writeup or arguement against the pod because certain people would take such a writeup as an attack and not just an opinion..

anyone want to take the 'pro' side if i take the 'con' side?

:liverd:

---

Ok... I love the Pod. The Pod is great. The Pod is special.

I'm stuck on something concerning 911.

1. Either the highjacked planes were flown somewhere and replaced with bomb friendly destructive planes or the four planes that were highjacked were actually used. People did board those planes in the airports and are missing

I have reached the point where I believe that all four planes highjacked were the ones used.

2. IMHO: Since the actual planes highjacked were used they were outfitted to be fail proof. I do not think the highjackers were capable of making perfect hits.

Think about this when the 2nd plane came upon the WTC the passengers had to see the other bldg smoking with flames it was a clear day. Are you going to sit in your seat and not do anything. It is why I believe that after taking off the planes had some type of gas in the ventilation system disabling everyone and were then remote controlled to their final destination making perfect hits. It is very possible that Plane #4 was a backup plane. It was shot down when no longer needed.

3. IMHO: The remote control center was in bldg #7 for the NY planes and at the Pentagon or nearby for the other 2. It is possible that the gas in the vent system failed on the Penn. flight and that passengers did try and overtake the HJers, at this point it may have become dangerous to allow this plane to land due to evidence. I have read that this Flt was actually the first scheduled flt for this route at this time, it is why so few were on board.

4. Bush is on tape as saying that the US could remotely takeover planes, I am assuming that means fly and land them.

5. If you watch the plane flying into the 6ft. thick concrete wall demo. you will see there is nothing left of it. I am assuming that is what happened to the Pentagon. It is possible that this was a smaller plane mad into a missle and flt 77 was flown out to sea and then destroyed. I would think that if that is what happened some type of wreakage no matter how small would have eventually drifted to shore. So I will stick to 77 hitting the Pentagon. I will always believe that it was remote controlled due to the manuever performed just before impact.

6. Do you really need pods on the planes if you can prewire the 3 WTC bldgs in the days before. There is proof that the bldgs were closed above the 48th floor and proof that bombs went off in the basment of the bldg. The Pentagon did not need to be destroyed but it did need to be hit. If it wasn't, the thinking here is this becomes an FBI case of murdering civilians after the Pentagon hit it becomes more like an attack on the US Military.

7. The confiscation of the videos and the disappearance of the black boxes are the most obvious examples of coverup. The Put options and the fight to prevent an investigation are almost as telling.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aceace

I'm stuck on something concerning 911.

1. Either the highjacked planes were flown somewhere and replaced with bomb friendly destructive planes or the four planes that were highjacked were actually used. People did board those planes in the airports and are missing

I have reached the point where I believe that all four planes highjacked were the ones used.

2. IMHO: Since the actual planes highjacked were used they were outfitted to be fail proof. I do not think the highjackers were capable of making perfect hits.

Think about this when the 2nd plane came upon the WTC the passengers had to see the other bldg smoking with flames it was a clear day. Are you going to sit in your seat and not do anything. It is why I believe that after taking off the planes had some type of gas in the ventilation system disabling everyone and were then remote controlled to their final destination making perfect hits. It is very possible that Plane #4 was a backup plane. It was shot down when no longer needed.

3. IMHO: The remote control center was in bldg #7 for the NY planes and at the Pentagon or nearby for the other 2. It is possible that the gas in the vent system failed on the Penn. flight and that passengers did try and overtake the HJers, at this point it may have become dangerous to allow this plane to land due to evidence. I have read that this Flt was actually the first scheduled flt for this route at this time, it is why so few were on board.

4. Bush is on tape as saying that the US could remotely takeover planes, I am assuming that means fly and land them.

5. If you watch the plane flying into the 6ft. thick concrete wall demo. you will see there is nothing left of it. I am assuming that is what happened to the Pentagon. It is possible that this was a smaller plane mad into a missle and flt 77 was flown out to sea and then destroyed. I would think that if that is what happened some type of wreakage no matter how small would have eventually drifted to shore. So I will stick to 77 hitting the Pentagon. I will always believe that it was remote controlled due to the manuever performed just before impact.

6. Do you really need pods on the planes if you can prewire the 3 WTC bldgs in the days before. There is proof that the bldgs were closed above the 48th floor and proof that bombs went off in the basment of the bldg. The Pentagon did not need to be destroyed but it did need to be hit. If it wasn't, the thinking here is this becomes an FBI case of murdering civilians after the Pentagon hit it becomes more like an attack on the US Military.

7. The confiscation of the videos and the disappearance of the black boxes are the most obvious examples of coverup. The Put options and the fight to prevent an investigation are almost as telling.

---

Knock yourself out...

http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1457

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by somebigguy

I haven't seen any of those reopen 911 vids, I ordered mine months ago and never received it. Are they any good????

---

oh yeah, i thought it was great.. while i disagree with some of those on the DVD, it was a great overview of opinions and issues surrounding 9/11.. did you ever re-order? ive gotten 4 in the mail.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dazinith

oh yeah, i thought it was great.. while i disagree with some of those on the DVD, it was a great overview of opinions and issues surrounding 9/11.. did you ever re-order? ive gotten 4 in the mail.

---

I never ordered another one, since he was giving them away for free, I didn't want to take advantage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by somebigguy

I never ordered another one, since he was giving them away for free, I didn't want to take advantage.

---

yeah.. ive given away about 8 copies so far, so i dont feel bad about it.. i think i was sent 4 because i signed up to be a volunteer..

order another copy already, or PM me an address to send a copy to.

ok ok i know sbg, i have a way with words.. lol

but if you reread golds post after he had watch the flick and tell me it doesnt sound like he just saw the flash for the first time....

not that it matters but gold knows what im talking about...lol... dont fuck with me gold... GHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aceace

I'm stuck on something concerning 911.

1. Either the highjacked planes were flown somewhere and replaced with bomb friendly destructive planes or the four planes that were highjacked were actually used. People did board those planes in the airports and are missing

I have reached the point where I believe that all four planes highjacked were the ones used.

2. IMHO: Since the actual planes highjacked were used they were outfitted to be fail proof. I do not think the highjackers were capable of making perfect hits.

Think about this when the 2nd plane came upon the WTC the passengers had to see the other bldg smoking with flames it was a clear day. Are you going to sit in your seat and not do anything. It is why I believe that after taking off the planes had some type of gas in the ventilation system disabling everyone and were then remote controlled to their final destination making perfect hits. It is very possible that Plane #4 was a backup plane. It was shot down when no longer needed.

3. IMHO: The remote control center was in bldg #7 for the NY planes and at the Pentagon or nearby for the other 2. It is possible that the gas in the vent system failed on the Penn. flight and that passengers did try and overtake the HJers, at this point it may have become dangerous to allow this plane to land due to evidence. I have read that this Flt was actually the first scheduled flt for this route at this time, it is why so few were on board.

4. Bush is on tape as saying that the US could remotely takeover planes, I am assuming that means fly and land them.

5. If you watch the plane flying into the 6ft. thick concrete wall demo. you will see there is nothing left of it. I am assuming that is what happened to the Pentagon. It is possible that this was a smaller plane mad into a missle and flt 77 was flown out to sea and then destroyed. I would think that if that is what happened some type of wreakage no matter how small would have eventually drifted to shore. So I will stick to 77 hitting the Pentagon. I will always believe that it was remote controlled due to the manuever performed just before impact.

6. Do you really need pods on the planes if you can prewire the 3 WTC bldgs in the days before. There is proof that the bldgs were closed above the 48th floor and proof that bombs went off in the basment of the bldg. The Pentagon did not need to be destroyed but it did need to be hit. If it wasn't, the thinking here is this becomes an FBI case of murdering civilians after the Pentagon hit it becomes more like an attack on the US Military.

7. The confiscation of the videos and the disappearance of the black boxes are the most obvious examples of coverup. The Put options and the fight to prevent an investigation are almost as telling.

---

why didnt the plane that hit the pentagon break any of the windows where the wings would have hit??? no way did a plane hit the pentagon...