Gatekeeping Against The Concrete Core

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AuGmENTor

That's bullshit. They should absolutely be available from somewhere, even if it were the original designers. Some asian dood, no?

---

Ya, that is BS.

Here is what happened to the cities WTC documents.

http://www.nyclu.org/g_archive020602.html

It is a fact that FEMA didn't ever see the plans.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...lueprints.html

I have a copy of the 1964 preliminary plans (20 sheets) which were used by Minoru Yamasaki to evaluate the loads on the tower. The existing floor plans are based on those plans. There is nothing on the core.

Robertson knew better than to try and design a steel core that he couldn't complete the engineering calc.s' on.

Here are scans of the 1964 preliminaries, same as what I have, I actually have a few more sheets tho.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evid...lan/index.html

So far the only thing I've found them useful for is to show that the towers faces were aligned to cardinal directions. Believe it or not; topozone, FEMA, mapquest, all have the north arrow rotated about 25 degree CCW in the online images.

I see it as an attempt to compromise peoples eforts to commincate about images of the towers and the WTC. There are about 4 posters over at democraticunderground that can't understand that the architects site plan showing the towers aligned in cardinal directions is the final call. They insisted on using the FEMA image or topozone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by royster

LITERALLY sleeping together, while carrying out New World Order instructions.
Again; IT'S MY Scrabble word: you may challenge me.
However, I stepped on Chris' transmit....forgive me.

---

I haven't finished my crow from last time. No thanx...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by royster

Not to get tabloid, but there is some validity to the North tower getting hit first, the flight #s etc.. Those freemasons just LOVE their numberology.

---

Yes. And Muslims love to intervene in that. My site puts together the only realistic explanation for the "Wrong Tower Fell First" issue that I've seen yet.

"towers fell in the wrong order"

It's based on the assumption that Atta was flying flight 11 and that he willfully disobeyed orders, the plan, just to whack the north tower on the north side.

All of these ancient spiritual factions regard the north as "Where the magic of life comes from." So Atta did a double whammy with the first strike that actually did the real America, a big favor. With his act the entire event was made nonsensical with regard to the official collapse story to the most "sherlockian" minds.

The plan would have been that flight 11 was to hit the west side of WTC 2 at the approximate elevation 175 hit and that 175 was supposed to hit WTC 1 on the south side. My link above explains more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by royster

Did you know that Ray Kroc, Walt Disney and Herbert Hoover were...well, your worst nightmare.

---

That, ............. explains a lot.

Quote:

---

for the "Wrong Tower Fell First" issue that I've seen yet.

---

What's interesting to me is that people with some intelligence are not questioning that two buildings got hit in two totally different places, by planes travelling at different speeds, with different angles of impact. From THAT, both towers just happened to fall in exactly the same way. This doesn't strike these people as abnormal at all? Blech

However, I don't believe anyone was at the controls of the vehicles that struck the WTC Towers. Thus, Atta was the dupe that several threads...including 7/7, indicate. This is a deliberate "blur" area, and it is best navigated by recalling the facts...including when the actual planes were decomisioned; some of them in 2005.

This is a matter of FAA public record. #s available, records exist. Lucy, you got some 'splainin' to do.

Aug, the planes hit at a minimum of 300 mph. Fuel doesn't just stop and go down to the lobby to buy a coke.

Regardless of the core issue...all due respects, Chris...the fact that the steel structure should have been a popsicle stick in the video, yet it fell in the same free fall, clearly indicates controlled demolition of cutting the steel skeleton. Regardless of dust poofs, however the physics arrived, it was premeditated murder, and perhaps this is the frusteration you generate from all the web sites you try to post at, and I, too would like to see what you are actively doing for the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by royster

However, I don't believe anyone was at the controls of the vehicles that struck the WTC Towers. Thus, Atta was the dupe that several threads...including 7/7, indicate. This is a deliberate "blur" area, and it is best navigated by recalling the facts...including when the actual planes were decomisioned; some of them in 2005.

---

http://www.infowars.net/articles/july2006/060706Registrations.html

why didn't that register? http://www.infowars.net/articles/jul...strations.html