Printable View
OMG i've just notice something!!!
Video is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L75Gga92WO8&NR
Look at frames and so when "plane" hit pentagon... do you see that pieces of building flying around and in front of camera? How far is, and how big they are, and they are flying! Now, ask your self can plane do that or missile (explosion with blast)? As you can see when second plane hit tower there is no such pieces.
Welcome Eldinaa. Good to see you're paying attention. Alot of us have pretty much let the whole Pentagon/missle debate go. It just runs in circles. They can site all sorts of evidence to substantiate their claim (IE eyewitness accounts, the fact that the FBI has now release "clear"footage of a plane hitting) Take your time and go through the posts here and what you will find is that the only thing you need to do to convince people that something is askew is the TRUTH. It's kinda what we're all about. Enough arguing about if there were explosions prior to impact. Alot of time is wasted on these items. Go google "911 press for truth" or "terrorstorm" (2 of the best in my opinion).
Are you new to this? If not, you will STILL find things here that will fill in some blanks for you. Glad you came.
I've read lots of it... but still i didn't find any article that said what did i just said.
Anyway... your opinion is... plane or missile???
Kisses...
I am not sure if augie was being sarcastistic when he said ...
cause I have yet to see this footage.Quote:
the FBI has now release "clear"footage of a plane hitting
As for everything else he said I agree. The Pentagon plane/missile argument is a no-win debate.
I pretty much never bring it up when I discuss 9/11 with newcomers.
...do I believe that a plane hit it? Well with the way loose change presents it and as well David Ray Griffin I would say no, a plane did not hit it.
Just like I don't rely on mainstream media for my news and understanding of the world around me, I don't rely on people within the movement either. Have they helped me along in waking up ....yes. But that certainly does not mean I take everything they say as gospel.
I think sometimes its a good idea to avoid being drenched by the thought shriveling radiowaves altogether and throwing my head in the sand to think on my own for awhile.
I can not understand why they would go through the trouble of switching crafts. This would be a completely ludicrious tactic. The belt-way is one the most busiest, most congested traffic areas in the country, why take the chance?
this is just my opinion .
Small plane/ jet. Missle would be way to obvious.
Or Flight 77?
Only if you believe the pentagon was a setup in which to dis-credit the truth movement later down the road.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gold9472
I only kid :) I still don't talk about the pentagon, regardless of what I personally think happened there.
Or maybe it's...
This...
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/171.jpg
Or this...
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/064-large.jpg
Or this...
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/178.jpg
Or this...
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/173-large.jpg
Or this...
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/065-large.jpg
Or this...
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/324.jpg
So tell me... what does this have to do with the fact that Washington D.C. airspace was vulnerable at a time when America was "under attack?"
34 minutes AFTER the SECOND tower was hit, a commercial airliner managed to penetrate Washington D.C. airspace, the most defended airspace in the world, and crash into the Pentagon.
I wonder why no one scrambled fighters immediately to defend Washington D.C. airspace at a time when America was "under attack" by kamikaze hijackers in commercial airliners...
Those are the kinds of questions I have about the Pentagon.
And don't get me started about Mineta.
Duh, captain obvious! Of COURSE I was. That footage may as well be the Hindenburgh, or the Snoopy balloon from the Macy's day parade crashing.Quote:
I am not sure if augie was being sarcastistic when he said ...
Me niether. All the arguments support that a plane didn't hit. But there are ALOT of credible witnesses who said there was a plane. That is the main reason I don't get into it. I could go either way. Within the movement, I stick to things I KNOW.Quote:
...do I believe that a plane hit it? Well with the way loose change presents it and as well David Ray Griffin I would say no, a plane did not hit it.
Me niether. There are a few people who I do pretty much listen to. That is because I understand that there are things I don't understand. I don't rely on mainstream media, but I have to get info somewhere. There comes a time when you have to trust someone.Quote:
I don't rely on people within the movement either. Have they helped me along in waking up ....yes. But that certainly does not mean I take everything they say as gospel.
This is the advice I use.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gold9472