GOLD , I NEED YOUR HELP ... TV INTERVIEW

Tommorrow I am being interviewed (for TV) about why I started the Libertarian party in Lawrence Co. I spoke at length with the man that will be doing the interview that will air on PBS in a few weeks. I explained that some of my motivation to start the LP here was somewhat controversial and due to research on 911 and that I have come to the conclusion that the US Govt was involved. That I had completed probably 2500 hours of research. I asked him if he wanted to include that and he said yeah! I don't want to sound like a moron or an insane conspiracy theorists.

So what are the main points you would touch on? All the advice I can get please.

Sibel Edmonds
Robert Wright
Professor Steven E. Jones
The 9/11 Commission
Bill Doyle's recent comments
The Warnings
The Wargames

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gold9472

Sibel Edmonds
Robert Wright
Professor Steven E. Jones
The 9/11 Commission
Bill Doyle's recent comments
The Warnings
The Wargames

---

Could you break down about what you would say about each.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aceace

Could you break down about what you would say about each.

---

Ugh... c'mon man...

Wargames, 2 of which resembled what happened that day, received a footnote in the back of the 9/11 Report. When confronted by Rep. Cynthia McKinney, General Richard Myers refused to say who was in charge of the Wargames that day. When General Ralph E. Eberhardt testified before the 9/11 Commission, he stated that because of the Wargames that were taking place that day, they were better able to deal with the situation. However, if they were better able to deal with the situation, why didn't they? When asked about them in public, General Ralph E. Eberhardt said "No comment". One of the air traffic controllers asked "Is this real world or exercise" while the "hijackings" were taking place. Obviously the Wargames caused confusion that morning, or worse, may have been the cover for the operation known as 9/11. Why is it acceptable that they were barely mentioned in the 9/11 Report? Why is it acceptable that General Myers is allowed to disregard a question about them on the House Floor?

There... that's the wargames.

Here, if I was you I'd take notes from these 2 clips, one of Jones on MTV, the other of him on CNN:

http://yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthr...ght=alex+jones

http://yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthr...ght=alex+jones

The 9/11 Commission
Formally known as the "National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States"

Click Here

This took place on March 21st, 2006 at a rare Press Conference Bush gave in the White House Press room. Helen Thomas asked him a simple question.

"Why did you really want to go to war from the moment you stepped into the White House?"

This is a well documented fact. "It was all about finding a way to do it" says Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill. Ron Suskind, a Wall Street Journal reporter, interviewed Paul O'Neill, and was told that's what it was all about in early 2001. Finding a "way" to invade Iraq.

Let's also not forget the drive of the PNAC to invade Iraq.

So why did the President lie to Helen?

Is it because if the President wanted to invade Iraq before 9/11, and the only way he could do so was by something like 9/11 happening, and then something like 9/11 DOES happen... Doesn't that make him a suspect?

Of course it does.

9/11 was a horrific event that murdered 1000's of people, but it was a crime. It was not an "act of war" like they claimed it to be. It was a murder on a massive scale.

Now, if he and his administration are a suspect in a crime, should they have the ability to pick and choose who and what gets investigated in that crime?

Of course not.

Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened. One thing's for sure though, it wasn't investigated without a fight.

You would think the President, who swore to protect and defend America, and its' people, would want to know how and why something like 9/11 happened, and to hold anyone responsible, or incompetent in their duties, accountable.

Unfortunately, that's not what happened. Instead, the President and his Administration fought tooth and nail for it not to be investigated, and instead of being held accountable, people were promoted.

When it was decided that the Congress would investigate the attacks, the President and Dick Cheney went to speak with Tom Daschle privately, and asked him to "limit the scope" of the investigation.

Tom Daschle later said the reason for this request was because the Vice President "expressed the concern that a review of what happened on September 11 would take resources and personnel away from the effort in the war on terrorism."

Cheney also went to speak with both intelligence committee chairmen, Bob Graham, and Porter Goss.

"They were discussing how the inquiry would proceed, including what would be made public, what would remain classified, and how broad the probe would be."

Just so you know... weeks before the 9/11 attacks...

"Senator Bob Graham (D), Representative Porter Goss (R), and Senator Jon Kyl (R) travel to Pakistan and meet with President Pervez Musharraf. They reportedly discuss various security issues, including the possible extradition of bin Laden. They also meet with Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan. Zaeef apparently tells them that the Taliban wants to solve the issue of bin Laden through negotiations with the US. Pakistan says it wants to stay out of the bin Laden issue. [Agence France-Presse, 9/28/2001; Salon, 10/14/2001]"

Then, on the morning of September 11th, in Washington D.C., the following took place...

"At the time of the attacks, ISI Director Lt. Gen. Mahmood Ahmed is at a breakfast meeting at the Capitol with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, Senator Bob Graham (D) and Representative Porter Goss (R) (Goss is a 10-year veteran of the CIA’s clandestine operations wing). The meeting is said to last at least until the second plane hits the WTC. [Washington Post, 6/18/2002] Graham and Goss later co-head the joint House-Senate investigation into the 9/11 attacks, which has made headlines for saying there was no “smoking gun” of Bush knowledge before 9/11. [Washington Post, 8/11/2002] Note that Senator Graham should have been aware of a report made to his staff the previous month (see Early August 2001) that one of Mahmood’s subordinates had told a US undercover agent that the WTC would be destroyed. Evidence suggests that attendee Mahmood ordered that $100,000 be sent to hijacker Mohamed Atta. Also present at the meeting were Senator Jon Kyl (R) and the Pakistani ambassador to the US, Maleeha Lodhi. (All or virtually all of the people in this meeting had previously met in Pakistan just a few weeks earlier.) Senator Graham says of the meeting: “We were talking about terrorism, specifically terrorism generated from Afghanistan.” The New York Times reports that bin Laden was specifically discussed. [New York Times, 7/3/2002; Salon, 10/14/2001; Vero Beach Press Journal, 10/12/2001]"

The Congressional Inquiry was released, but you may remember there were 28 pages redacted pages in it. Some have speculated that the redacted pages pertained to Saudi Arabia's possible involvement in the attacks.

Sound suspicious? It gets better.

Keep in mind, everything I just mentioned was in regard to the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11, not the "9/11 Commission". I thought it was important for you to know the full history of the "investigation" into 9/11.

As I said earlier, the Bush Administration fought tooth and nail for 9/11 not to be investigated. Eventually, family members started asking questions, and were demanding answers. A group of women formally known as the "Jersey Girls" started what they called the, "Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission". Their efforts in Washington D.C. are originally what made me start to question what happened that day.

It took 441 days for Washington D.C., and the Bush Administration to appoint an "Independent Commission" to investigate the attacks of 9/11.

If someone you loved was murdered, would you like it if the police waited 441 days to investigate the murder, or would you want them to get started right away?

When they decided to create the commission, the Bush Administration wanted Henry Kissinger to be the Chairman. Henry Kissinger has a LONG and sordid history, but aside from that, when the "Jersey Girls" learned he was Bush's pick, they questioned Mr. Kissinger on his business dealings. That was a "no-no" to Mr. Kissinger.

After all, we're trying to create an "Independent" commission aren't we?

Bush's next pick was Thomas Kean.

A reported by Truthout.org...

"Kean is also a director for the petroleum giant Amerada Hess, the food services corporation Amarak, and the Pepsi Bottling Group. Kean is likewise a board member of the Fiduciary Trust Company International. He is a former board member for the CIT Group and United Health Group.

It is his association with Hess that has drawn concern from 9/11 victims groups, because Hess has business agreements with Saudi Arabia and oil exploration facilities in Indonesia and Malaysia.

Not so "Independent" for a Chairman eh? Wait'll ya hear about the Co-Chairman.

Lee Hamilton has been around Washington D.C. for years. He served the 9th Congressional District of Indiana in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1965-1998.

He also "spearheaded" the Iran Contra Congressional Investigation.

You remember that don't you? The same group of individuals who are in power now, are the same group of individuals who were in power then.

Anyway, back to Hamilton...

"...former Congressman Lee Hamilton, chairman of the House select committee investigating the Iran-contra affair, was shown ample evidence against Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, but he did not probe their wrongdoing. Why did Hamilton choose not to investigate? In a late 1980s interview aired on PBS 'Frontline,' Hamilton said that he did not think it would have been 'good for the country' to put the public through another impeachment trial. In Lee Hamilton's view, it was better to keep the public in the dark than to bring to light another Watergate, with all the implied ramifications."

Oh I see... they wanted someone KNOWN to coverup information to co-chair the commission.

There are other conflicts of interest regarding other members of the Commission. You can read about them here.

Now, we get to my FAVORITE part. Not only was the window dressing filled with conflicts of interest, but the one who was actually in charge of the investigation was a MEMBER of the Bush Administration.

Philip Zelikow. Executive Director of the "Independent" 9/11 Commission.

The "Jersey Girls" insisted that he resign, but they were denied.

Bryan Sacks wrote a GREAT article filled with links, and videos called, "Philip Zelikow: The Bush Administration Investigates The Bush Administration".

The last person I want to mention is Senator Max Cleland. The man who fought in Vietnam, and lost 3 of his limbs.

He was originally appointed to the Commission, but low and behold...

"Cleland attacked his own commission after the other members cut a deal to accept highly limited access to CIA reports to the White House that may indicate advance knowledge of the attacks on the part of the Bush administration. "This is a scam," Cleland said. "It's disgusting. America is being cheated."


"As each day goes by," Cleland said, "we learn that this government knew a whole lot more about these terrorists before September 11 than it has ever admitted.... Let's chase this rabbit into the ground. They had a plan to go to war and when 9/11 happened that's what they did; they went to war."

The "Jersey Girls" submitted a list of questions to the "Independent 9/11 Commission". I had dinner with Mr. Bob McIlvaine recently, and he told me the commission answered only 2 of these questions. I've heard other accounts that maybe a few more were answered, but I don't know the exact amount. The fact is, barely ANY of them were touched on in the commission's final report. He also told me that Commissioner Ben Veniste told him that the Commission itself was an "exposition".

Remember the allegation of a $100,000 wire transfer from Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad of the Pakistani ISI to Mohammad Atta? That was one of their questions to the commission.

Thomas Kean was recently confronted on that wire transfer, and said he "wasn't aware" of any wire transfer.

Just so you know, Pakistan has recently been accused of bribing 9/11 Commission officials. Pakistan allegedly wanted all information pertaining to their involvement in the attacks to be omitted from the commission's report. Pakistan denied it of course.

Considering nothing was mentioned in the report regarding Pakistan's involvement, it appears as though those allegation may be true.

The Commission's mandate was to provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and recommendations as to how to prevent such attacks in the future.

I've shown you just a VERY small amount of information that wasn't mentioned in the 9/11 Commission's report.

The "Jersey Girls" referred to the 9/11 Commission's report as a "Hollow Failure".

Some of them are still fighting for the truth today.

The 9/11 Commission's full report is available online for everyone to read. Given what we know about the attacks today, I present it to you as evidence against the Bush Administration for the attacks of September 11th.

The attacks were never investigated. Considering everything that's taking place today is happening because of 9/11, I suggest we do, and I suggest we follow the trail, WHEREEVER IT MAY LEAD.

I will be happy to take your questions.

I'll give you a while to read this and take it in... brb, going to get some coffee...

Thanks to www.cooperativeresearch.org, Kyle Hence, Michael Meacher, Mr. McIlvaine, and to the "Jersey Girls" for at least trying to do what's right, and for showing me just a few can make a difference.

Man that's good stuff.

I'm telling all my friends tommorrow what a great guy you are.

When I asked for you to expand on your points. I only meant a sentence or two.

I wrote that commission thing before.

wow never saw that alex jones on mtv before...

I think all of us that come to this site feel very strongly about 9-11 (obviously). As such I don't think I am alone in this; -if I am lying in bed awake, or driving in my car, or in the shower, whenever, I a lot of times think of what to say to people, how should I begin my arguement and so-on.

here is my typical beginning rant that I have used many times....

Do you believe that an Arab in Afganistan, in a cave, devised a plan which upon its execution would successfully exploit a trillion dollar defense system 4 times in one day? That this arab had the power to cause Norad to stand down? That he was able to somehow manipulate the Pentagon's own missile defense battery and cause it not to be operational? That 20 some odd of his minions were able to walk among us in different parts of the country and communicate and coordinate between each other and back to afganistan without our intelligence picking up that chatter, even though just about every other major intelligence agency in the world picked it up and warned us? Are you aware that even the Taliban warned us of the coming attack and specified hijackings one month prior?

Depending on how that goes I dive into building 7. After wtc7 I commence with a barrage of FACTS. I have yet to discuss the pentagon issue just because it is speculative and with all the other evidence (scientific or eyewitness, etc) it is simply not needed.

Just about all the information I have on the subject I aquired from this site. If you look back to my first post I was sceptical at best.
When I do talk to people about this I usaully talk for well over an hour, I have gone 2 1/2 and could have easily continued. I think you don't realize how much you know, I know I didn't until I actually started debating it with other people outside the safety of the net.

Ace, good luck tomorrow!!!

If feel you werther. I wasn't to familiar with Jones until the whole Charlie Sheen thing broke. And the way he kicked ass on MTV was great.