The Millions More March
Click Here
http://home.comcast.net/~gold9472/millionsmore.gif
LOOK AT ALL OF THE PEOPLE!!!
Printable View
The Millions More March
Click Here
http://home.comcast.net/~gold9472/millionsmore.gif
LOOK AT ALL OF THE PEOPLE!!!
"This is not a march, we buildin' a movement... we buildin' a movement..."
Wow... great song by Wyclef Jean
I'd like to say this isn't about black and white.
I KNOW blacks have it hard. I KNOW that... and I believe in equality for EVERYONE but this isn't about blacks, and whites anymore. This is about AMERICANS taking their country back from the bastards who sit in Government. Who take away our rights. Who take away our money. Who take away our lives. Who take away our FREEDOM.
well said..Quote:
Originally Posted by Gold9472
Well, I'm watching this... and a lot of people are talking about "Black Power", etc... and restarting the "Black Panthers", and needing "soldiers", etc...Quote:
Originally Posted by 911=inside job
Ok... but fight for people. Not just blacks. Everyone has been affected by this Government. Everyone, everywhere.
Here's a better picture...
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/US/10/15....march2.ap.jpg
Don't worry, I'm recording him just in case. ;)
Glad they're behaving themselves. these are Muslims I think. http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/248645.shtml Entire article:re free speach
This is The Cover up of the coveruppers.
Michael Chertoff didn't respond to Katrina fast enough because he was appointed to cover up the government's involvement in attacks on our country!
No race war!
I wonder if Latimore was in Toledo?
http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/248645.shtml Entire article:re free speach
This is the Cover up of the coveruppers.
Michael Chertoff didn't respond to Katrina fast enough because he was appointed to cover up the government's involvement in attacks on our country! See the excerpts there by Patrick Briley, on who Latimore is. He was present at all three attacks on this country. Called FBI
Glad they're not rioting, go look at Toldedo. Someone wants a race war in this country, sure isn't me!
If you read Patrick Briely, in my article http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/248645.shtml
you'll see Latimore was , in full knowlledge of the FBI, present at all three terrible attacks on this country. WTC1, Oklahoma, and 911. I wonder if he was in Toledo today, at the riots, leading the rioters? Amazing how this Toledo riot of blacks upstaged the peaceful Black Muslim, one million March in Washington, isn't it?These Black Muslims, FAMILY oriented people, didn't riot. Finally realizing family matters, Black Muslims show they can assemble peacefully, but CNN spent more time covering the Toledo uprising. Why?
Anything to divert the citizen of the laws pending. This one, http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/248645.shtml
is designed to end political dissent, by making it a crime to even say "Zionist" Under the Patriot Act, they can trace where you are, using the "Basketball" program, tracing your debit card, arresting you, without benifit of a lawyer, ship to to internment camps, and dissappear. Total information Act= "Basketball". Look it up on the Internet while you still can.
Be sure to read all this article and especially the comments, where the ADL confesses to Israel's role in 911.
The N.W.O. New World Order has been at it since the creation of the Federal Reserve. See the Comment in this article about the Federal Reserve_ private profiteers sucking Americans dry.
Not only can these private bankers get more of your money using debit cards, they can pinpoint exactly where you are, and when this law passes, they will find you. Orwell would be rolling over!
Just look at http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/exp.htm to start.
This ADL report is simply BRILLIANT!!! A textbook case of applied reverse-psychology.
For those who already read it, read it again, this time keeping in mind what I just pointed out.
http://seattle.indymedia.org/img/extlink.gif http://www.adl.org/anti_semitism/9-11conspiracytheories.pdf
This is the ONLY paper of its kind that can be disseminated to the world at large without fear of reprisal – think about it. All the facts, dates, chronology, quotes... everything. In the open, un-refuted. The Sword of Truth.
Thanks ADL for the excellent summary:
Posted by: author at Oct 15, 2005 04:48
I don't agree with your antisemetic slurs that all Jews are money hungry, etc.. Many of my good friends are wonderful, intelligent Jewish people.
Thanks ADL for your comprehensive report of w
Posted by: reader at Oct 15, 2005 02:20
Where are your proofs? You cited many references, yet where is your refutation? I appreciate the time you spent making this: it is a great resource.!!!
Simple: PNAC (Project for a New American Century) members mostly Jewish, decided they needed a New Pearl Harbor, and a born again President with interests in oil, came to Israel's defence after the Iranian revolution, to help Israel reconnect pipe lines, so with CIA and Israeli help staged 911 to attack Iraq, and claim its oil. Cheney had Haliburton, Rumsfield has drugs, and they revisited the 1979 plan to attack the WTC with airliners, and blame it on Sadamn Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. Bush lied to Congress saying nearly 140 Israeli citizens were killed in the WTC, you admit it was only seven, You talked about Larry Silverstein as the owner of the WTC, how did WTC 7 collapse?, it wasn't hit by a plane. You talk of the 5 dancing happy Israeli Mossad, who were deported with Michael Chertoff's help. You spoke of the Israeli firm that owns Logan Airport. Thanks for that confirmation. You Told of the Israeli info on communications, and you give credence to the Conspiracy TRUTH(NOT THEORY) because you reveal all this Israeli involvement! You failed to mention however, the money the US gives in foreign aid to Israel, comes back via Israel's powerful lobby, AIPAC to bribe Congressmen's Campaign chests,because the average American is too busy working and spending 1/3 their incomes to government and pay for the national debt, which goes to your private bankers in the Federal reserve system.
The following is a conversation with Mr. Ron Supinski of the Public Information Department of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank. This is an account of that conversation.
CALLER - Mr. Supinski, does my country own the Federal Reserve System?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are an agency of the government.
CALLER - That's not my question. Is it owned by my country?
MR. SUPINSKI - It is an agency of the government created by congress.
CALLER - Is the Federal Reserve a Corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Does my government own any of the stock in the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - No, it is owned by the member banks.
CALLER - Are the member banks private corporations?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?
MR. SUPINSKI-Yes, by the assets of the Federal Reserve but, primarily by the power of congress to lay tax on the people.
CALLER - Did you say, by the power to collect taxes is what backs Federal Reserve Notes?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - What are the total assets of the Federal Reserve?
MR. SUPINSKI - The San Francisco Bank has $36 Billion in assets.
CALLER - What are these assets composed of?
MR. SUPINSKI - Gold, the Federal Reserve Bank itself and government securities.
CALLER - What value does the Federal Reserve Bank carry gold per oz. on their books?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't have that information but the San Francisco Bank has $1.6 billion in gold.
CALLER - Are you saying the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has $1.6 billion in gold, the bank itself and the balance of the assets is government securities?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.
CALLER - Where does the Federal Reserve get Federal Reserve Notes from?
MR. SUPINSKI - They are authorized by the Treasury.
CALLER - How much does the Federal Reserve pay for a $10 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - Fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - How much do they pay for a $100.00 Federal Reserve Note?
MR. SUPINSKI - The same fifty to seventy cents.
CALLER - To pay only fifty cents for a $100.00 is a tremendous gain, isn't it?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - According to the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve pays $20.60 per 1,000 denomination or a little over two cents for a $100.00 bill, is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is probably close.
CALLER - Doesn't the Federal Reserve use the Federal Reserve Notes that cost about two cents each to purchase US Bonds from the government?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, but there is more to it than that.
CALLER - Basically, that is what happens?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, basically you are correct.
CALLER - How many Federal Reserve Notes are in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - $263 billion and we can only account for a small percentage.
CALLER - Where did they go?
MR. SUPINSKI - Peoples mattress, buried in their back yards and illegal drug money.
CALLER - Since the debt is payable in Federal Reserve Notes, how can the $4 trillion national debt be paid-off with the total Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - If the Federal Government would collect every Federal Reserve Note in circulation would it be mathematically possible to pay the $4 trillion national debt?
MR. SUPINSKI - No
CALLER - Am I correct when I say, $1 deposited in a member bank $8 can be lent out through Fractional Reserve Policy?
MR. SUPINSKI - About $7.
CALLER - Correct me if I am wrong but, $7 of additional Federal Reserve Notes were never put in circulation. But, for lack of better words were "created out of thin air " in the form of credits and the two cents per denomination were not paid either. In other words, the Federal Reserve Notes were not physically printed but, in reality were created by a journal entry and lent at interest. Is that correct?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Is that the reason there are only $263 billion Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?
MR. SUPINSKI - That is part of the reason.
CALLER - Am I mistaking that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed (on Christmas Eve) in 1913, it transferred the power to coin and issue our nation's money and to regulate the value thereof from Congress to a Private corporation. And my country now borrows what should be our own money from the Federal Reserve (a private corporation) plus interest. Is that correct and the debt can never be paid off under the current money system of country?
MR. SUPINSKI - Basically, yes.
CALLER - I smell a rat, do you?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am sorry, I can't answer that, I work here.
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been independently audited?
MR. SUPINSKI - We are audited.
CALLER - Why is there a current House Resolution 1486 calling for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve by the GAO and why is the Federal Reserve resisting?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.
CALLER - Does the Federal Reserve regulate the value of Federal Reserve Notes and interest rates?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes
CALLER - Explain how the Federal Reserve System can be Constitutional if, only the Congress of the US, which comprises of the Senate and the House of representatives has the power to coin and issue our money supply and regulate the value thereof? [Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8] Nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation or, does it?
MR. SUPINSKI - I am not an expert on constitutional law. I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - I can tell you I have read the Constitution. It does NOT provide that any power granted can be transferred to a private corporation. Doesn't it specifically state, all other powers not granted are reserved to the States and to the citizens? Does that mean to a private corporation?
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't think so, but we were created by Congress.
CALLER - Would you agree it is our country and it should be our money as provided by our Constitution?
MR. SUPINSKI - I understand what you are saying.
CALLER - Why should we borrow our own money from a private consortium of bankers? Isn't this why we had a revolution, created a separate sovereign nation and a Bill of Rights?
MR. SUPINSKI - (Declined to answer).
CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe there has been court cases on the matter.
CALLER - Have there been Supreme Court Cases?
MR. SUPINSKI - I think so, but I am not sure.
CALLER - Didn't the Supreme Court declare unanimously in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. vs. US and Carter vs. Carter Coal Co. the corporative-state arrangement an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power? ["The power conferred is the power to regulate. This is legislative delegation in its most obnoxious form; for it is not even delegation to an official or an official body, presumptively disinterested, but to private persons." Carter vs. Carter Coal Co...]
MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know, I can refer you to our legal department.
CALLER - Isn't the current money system a house of cards that must fall because, the debt can mathematically never be paid-off?
MR. SUPINSKI - It appears that way. I can tell you have been looking into this matter and are very knowledgeable. However, we do have a solution.
CALLER - What is the solution?
MR. SUPINSKI - The Debit Card.
CALLER - Do you mean under the EFT Act (Electronic Funds Transfer)? Isn't that very frightening, when one considers the capabilities of computers? It would provide the government and all it's agencies, including the Federal Reserve such information as: You went to the gas station @ 2:30 and bought $10.00 of unleaded gas @ $1.41 per gallon and then you went to the grocery store @ 2:58 and bought bread, lunch meat and milk for $12.32 and then went to the drug store @ 3:30 and bought cold medicine for $5.62. In other words, they would know where we go, when we went, how much we paid, how much the merchant paid and how much profit he made. Under the EFT they will literally know everything about us. Isn't that kind of scary?
MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, it makes you wonder.
CALLER - I smell a GIANT RAT that has overthrown my constitution. Aren't we paying tribute in the form of income taxes to a consortium of private bankers?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't call it tribute, it is interest.
CALLER - Haven't all elected officials taken an oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic? Isn't the Federal Reserve a domestic enemy?
MR. SUPINSKI - I can't say that.
CALLER - Our elected officials and members of the Federal Reserve are guilty of aiding and abetting the overthrowing of my Constitution and that is treason. Isn't the punishment of treason death?
MR. SUPINSKI - I believe so.
CALLER - Thank you for your time and information and if I may say so, I think you should take the necessary steps to protect you and your family and withdraw your money from the banks before the collapse, I am.
MR. SUPINSKI - It doesn't look good.
CALLER - May God have mercy on the souls who are behind this unconstitutional and criminal act called the Federal Reserve. When the ALMIGHTY MASS awakens to this giant hoax, they will not take it with a grain of salt. It has been a pleasure talking to you and I thank you for your time. I hope you will take my advice before it does collapse.
MR. SUPINSKI - Unfortunately, it does not look good.
CALLER - Have a good day and thanks for your time.
MR. SUPINSKI - Thanks for calling.
If the reader has any doubts to the validity of this conversation, call your nearest Federal Reserve Bank, YOU KNOW THE QUESTIONS TO ASK! You won't find them listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true.
And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. US, case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentality's . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations - federal reserve banks are listed neither as "wholly-owned' government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 USC Section 856] . . . 28 USC Sections 1346(b), 2671. '
Federal agency' is defined as: the executive departments, the military departments, independent establishments of the United States, and corporations acting primarily as instrumentality's of the United States, but does not include any contractors with the United States . . . There are no sharp criteria for determining whether an entity is a federal agency within the meaning of the Act, but the critical factor is the existence of the federal government control over the 'detailed physical performance' and 'day to day operations' of that entity.
Other factors courts have considered include whether the entity is an independent corporation . . . whether the government is involved in the entity's finances, . . . and whether the mission of the entity furthers the policy of the United States . . . Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities ...
It is evident from the legislative history of the Federal Reserve Act that Congress did not intend to give the federal government direction over the daily operation of the Reserve Banks . . . The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks does not make them federal agencies under the Act . . . Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fire employees at will. Bank employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. They are covered by worker's compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather than the Federal Employees Compensation Act.
Employees traveling on Bank business are not subject to federal travel regulations and do not receive government employee discounts on lodging and services . . . Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own name. 12 USC Section 341. They carry their own liability insurance and typically process and handle their own claims . . ." According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, "When the Federal Reserve was created, its stock was sold to the member banks." ("The Hats The Federal Reserve Wears," published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia).
The original Stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks in 1913 were the Rockefeller's, JP Morgan, Rothschild's, Lazard Freres, Schoellkopf, Kuhn-Loeb, Warburgs, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs. The MONEYCHANGERS wanted to be insured they had a monopoly over our money supply, so Congress passed into law Title 12, Section 284 of the United States Code. Section 284 specifically states, "NO STOCK ALLOWED TO THE US" *
Monopoly - "A privilege or peculiar advantage vested in one or more persons or companies, consisting in the exclusive right [or power] to carry on a particular business or trade, manufacture a particular article, or control the sale of the whole supply of a particular commodity, A form of market structure in which only a few firms dominate the total sales of a product or service.
'Monopoly,' as prohibited by Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, has two elements: possession of a monopoly power in relevant market and willful acquisition or maintenance of that power, as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior power, business acumen, or historical product. A monopoly condemned by the Sherman Act is the power to fix prices, or exclude competition, coupled with policies designed to use and preserve that power." (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition) The Federal Reserve Act goes one step farther, "No Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or an officer or director of a Federal Reserve Bank." They didn't want We The People to have any say in the operation of their monopoly through our elected officials.
No court, no jury See the judge
Posted by: researcher at Oct 13, 2005 12:05 Definition of domestic terrorism.
Section 802 of the USA Patriot Act created a category of crime called “domestic terrorism,” which makes criminal any activities that “involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States” when the actor intends to “influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.” Previously, there was no analogous provision in statutory law. The overly broad nature of this provision is reason for concern when examined in light of its potential application to and effect on peaceful protests. The broad language of section 802 could potentially be used to punish participants of such peaceful demonstrations as a Greenpeace rally or the Million Man March, both of which fall squarely within the First Amendment, but which could also be the scene of an accidental injury and subsequent prosecution under this provision.
If someone suspects you have any links to terrorism, you can be held indefinitely, without benifit of a lawyer.
. Material witness statute
An undisclosed number of the individuals detained after September 11, 2001, have been arrested on material witness warrants pursuant to the Department’s authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3144. Although the Department refuses to reveal the exact number of individuals who have been held as such witnesses, a November 2002 Washington Post article identified 44 material witnesses and asserts that almost half of them never testified before a grand jury. In its May 13 letter to the Committee, the Department put the number of material witnesses detained as of January 2003 in conjunction with September 11 to be fewer than 50. The Justice Department has subsequently refused to update that number.
The Department has refused to provide any further information on those being held as material witnesses, claiming that it cannot do so because of the grand jury secrecy rules and sealing orders that have been entered by the courts, and has refused to release the orders themselves. Press reports, however, indicate that many individuals have been held as material witnesses for significant periods of time prior to testifying before grand juries, if they testified at all.
http://seattle.indymedia.org/img/extlink.gif http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/1966.php
These tell of the pending Hate Crime Bill before the Senate:
GESTAPO TAKE OVER INTERNET
by reach Monday, Oct. 10, 2005 at 6:59 AM
National Prayer Network
GLOBAL HATE CRIMES GESTAPO BEING CREATED
By Rev. Ted Pike
Christians and other lovers of truth and freedom were appalled last October when 11 Christians in Philadelphia were arrested, incarcerated, and threatened with 47 years in prison for the “hate crime” of preaching to homosexuals. They remain appalled at how Canada’s “thought police” bureaucracy continues to harass and indict Christians and the politically incorrect.
Yet imagine such legal confusion being established internationally. Envision “global governance” having powers to override national sovereignty and force governments to implement international hate crime laws.
Well, it is happening right now. B’nai B’rith International, the superpowerful Jewish religious, educational, fraternal, and charitable organization, has persuaded 55 nations (in which it has 2100 lodges and a half million Jewish members) to unite under the authority of a central European hate crimes command center. It is called OSCE, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
During the last three years B’nai B’rith has organized six huge “anti-hate” conferences in Europe, hosting not only foreign ministers from nations worldwide but featuring such charismatic political luminaries as Colin Powell and Rudolph Giuliani.
The prevailing message at these conferences, most recently held in Cordoba, Spain, is that anti-Semitism and other hate crimes are now at very dangerous levels worldwide. Unless the nations act immediately, enacting hate crimes laws, civilization is imperiled.
BANNING “HATE” ON THE INTERNET
According to OSCE, free speech on the Internet provides an unprecedented forum for purveyors of hate, i.e., those who criticize matters Jewish or homosexuality. Accordingly, B’nai B’rith has created the International Network against Cyberhate (INACH) to research and implement legal, political, and technological means to end the free speech of such “haters.” Such “haters,” of course, include the many free speech talk radio hosts who might criticize homosexuality or Israel or make use of the Internet to reach an international audience.
Of course, B’nai B’rith’s definition of hate is very different from everyone else’s. In the anti-hate bureaucracies which they are establishing throughout the world, “hate” equals “bias” against federally protected groups, especially Jews and homosexuals. Curiously, while ADL/B’nai B’rith has no problem with exercise of free speech by homosexuals and pornographers on the Internet, it has a huge problem with those who criticize homosexuality, the state of Israel, or matters Jewish.
OSCE has also established a global hate crimes statistics-gathering organization, the “Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights” (ODIHR) will marshal reports of “hate crimes incidents” occurring globally. ODIHR will receive data from the U.S. State Department’s “department of global anti-Semitism.” Such will complement reports from similar thought crimes bureaucracies being established in the more than 55 nations in which B’nai B’rith lobbies. The purpose of such statistics gathering is largely for propaganda purposes: Because ADL/B’nai B’rith defines hate and hate crimes as “bias” against members of protected groups, it is easy for such master propagandists to swell the numbers of “hate crimes incidents” to astronomical proportions. Result: the illusion of an “epidemic of hate” worldwide. As a result, more and more governments acquiesce to ADL/B’nai B’rith pressure and allow them to establish hate crimes bureaucracies in their nations.
LEVELS OF B’NAI B’RITH INFLUENCE
Local
Although establishment of an international hate crimes organization and enlisting 55 nations to become members is a tremendous achievement by ADL/B’nai B’rith, it is but the apex of their hate crimes agenda. Such descends to the community level. Through their “No Place for Hate” programs in cities and communities through America, ADL intensively organizes city governments, schools, churches, civic organizations, and citizen groups to combat “hate and homophobia” (Christianity) in their communities.
Michael Marcavage, head of the persecuted Philadelphia 11, documents how the entire borough of Landsdowne, Pennsylvania has been invaded by ADL and intensively propagandized in recent years. Every segment of the community from school children to commissioners has been inflamed against Christian critics of homosexuals. Such are boldly described as “haters.” Marcavage himself was the object of a candlelight march by several hundred Landsdowne residents decrying his “hate.” He was charged by the city council and police with the “hate crime” of reading the Bible in a city council meeting. Until the charge was finally dropped, Marcavage was threatened with a large fine of thousands of dollars and possible imprisonment.
State
During the 1990’s ADL persuaded 47 U.S. states to adopt some version of its “Model Anti-Hate Law Statute.” The Pennsylvania hate law which authorized arrest of the 11 Christians in Philadelphia last October 10th was an ADL hate law. Such state hate laws can be implemented against Christian pastors, talk show hosts, publishers, critics of Israel, etc. by ADL/B’nai B’rith at will.
Federal
ADL/B’nai B’rith is desperately trying to pass their ultimate prize: the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention of 2005. HR2662 was approved in amendment form by the House on Sept 16, 223-199. This Orwellian legislation will unite federal and state law enforcement into a vast “thought police bureaucracy” like Canada’s, ending free speech.
Just this week, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, homosexual Rep. Barney Frank argued on the floor of the House that passage of this bill, joining federal and local law enforcement, is necessary to provide a united front against racism and possible “hate crimes” resulting from the New Orleans disaster.
B’nai B’rith International has already created federal hate bureaucracies in many dozens of countries within its 55-nation sphere of influence.
Global
The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe is the central hub of ADL/B’nai B’rith’s intended hate law dominion over the entire world.
WHAT CAN WE DO?
Virtually all governments of Europe and the western industrialized world are accepting ADL logic and bogus statistics, allowing ADL/B’nai B’rith to set up hate crimes bureaucracies for them. Only in America is there concerted resistance to hate crimes legislation. Here, the only consistent, thorough, and specific opposition to ADL/B’nai B’rith’s global hate crimes agenda has come from 26 years of activism by the National Prayer Network. This has continued through my more than 140 talk show interviews during the last 14 months. The roughly 40 talk show hosts who have had the courage to interview me on their radio or TV programs have played an indispensable role. A handful of right wing newspapers and, just as important, the thousands of lovers of free speech who have protested to Congress have also played a dynamic role in saving free speech.
It is vital that this uniquely American message intensify in the months ahead. It must permeate not only heartland America but also the halls of Congress. ADL/B’nai B’rith are working toward a day, soon to come, when all the nations of the earth will demand that America also submit to global hate crimes governance. When that moment arrives, America will have to stand alone against the world. The only hope for strength of will in that hour of crisis is for those who love free speech to stand by the God who gave us this free nation and to stand by those who continue to sound the alarm.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protest “The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005” HR2662, S1145. Also protest the State Department’s new “Department of Global Anti-Semitism.” Call your members of Congress toll free at 1-877-762-8762.
Protest the U.S. State Department’s “Department of Global Anti-Semitism” by calling their comment line at 1-202-647-4000.