Printable View
Frontline: The Jesus Factor (60 minute documentary)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jesus/
"Examining George W. Bush's personal religious journey, it's impact on his poitical career and presidency, and the growing influence of America's Evangelica Christians"
Halloween is coming up if anybody likes scary movies.
Pretty darn good.
pretty dard old too... it is good though...Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
Whats the point? Is now his religon another reason to bitch incessantly about him?
It's not old. Only maybe a few weeks.
Yes, because he's intertwining it with politics and impossing his views on the rest of us. He's against science and so forth. Him impossing his religious views is hurting our country bad. As Stern pointed out, religion has been the downfall of many societies, just look at the Taliban for instance.Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
George Bush claims to be a born-again because most of his base is located in the churches. Feel free to read about Skull & Bones, Bohemian Grove, Jeffrey Gannon/Gosch.
George Bush is born again... according to the Fellowship's philosophy. While he was "awol", he spent time in a Fellowship run "drug rehab". It was there that he became "born again".
why dont you post anything good bush has done!!!! just one, please... until then quit sucking his dick!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
Lets not forget he claims to speak to God and God told him to attack Afghanistan and Iraq and is undoubtedly telling him to attack Iran, Syria, Venezuela and any other country that just happens to have oil.Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
There is a reason for a separation of church and state, its to keep bible thumping fools who think god is talking to him from making stupid decisions the rest of the country has to pay for.
Do you believe Bush was behind 9/11?
Also, the bible and science contradict, so what we're seeing is the rolling back of scientific thinking in exchange for philosophy that's thousands of years old.Quote:
Originally Posted by somebigguy
Fuck you, man. I just asked a fucking question, and you've got to go and say sometihng like that. I DON'T LIKE BUSH. He's a fuck up, and, as I've already said here on ybbs, his political mistakes are making a huge handicap against the next republican candidate. I do, however, like religon. Religon is the basis of civilization. I tend to get edgy around comments that potentially attack someone's religon.Quote:
Originally Posted by 911=inside job
I do keep an open mind, but it still seems unlikely to me. As far as I figure, if they're going to fake a terrorist attack on America, why'd they completely demolish the WTC, instead of just damaging it or shooting down the planes, and making sure everybody knew who was aiming them and where they were aimed. Destroying the towers was a huge damage to the economy, and caused a collosal loss of life.Quote:
Originally Posted by somebigguy
I am, however, completely behind the idea that Bush, and almost everyone in power who had anything to do with defence and itelligence fucked up really badly, and should be kicked out of power for that.
Hows that for sucking his dick?
its still sucking.... im sorry, anyone that has spent as much time here as you and still doesnt see that 911 was an inside job is a fucking moron!!!!
youre like a little kid...
C'mon kiddies...
I've spent plenty of time here, but almost none in the 9/11 forums. Its not a topic that piques my interest. Sorry to dissapoint you.
Religon is the basis of civilization.Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! now thats funny....
HAHAHA....I think we'd still be living in the dark ages if that were true.Quote:
Originally Posted by 911=inside job
It is true. Name one civilization that didn't have a theocratic based government when it began, besides america.
I think America did ...Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
it just wasn't the Church of England, which is what they didn't want to be a part of.
look at a huge amount of our laws ... how many of them are based in Puritan ideals?
when the founding fathers created this country, and separated church and state, they didn't intend to remove God and religion from the government. The idea of not involving God in their daily lives was unheard of at the time.
look at our money, it says 'in God we trust' The pledge of Allegiance references God. Almost every one of our national songs pays homage in some form to God ...
not true.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
They only contradict if you happen to subscribe to a faith that takes every word of the bible as the literal truth.
There are several Christian faiths that have no issues with science
But here's the point, most of those civilizations did not evolve when religion was involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
And I take back what I said about religion and policits being mixed. Many govnt's around the world have no problem with it. It doesnt really matter to me as long as the govenrment doesnt impose there views on anyone else. Especially in America because one the main pillars of our govt is the seperation between church and state.
Here's an example of what I mean: Christian fundemntalist want to start introducing "intellegent design" into our schools right along side evolution. They belive the world was created in 7 days, and man right after. They don't belive in evolution. Stem cell research is another thing they don't like. And a few others.Quote:
Originally Posted by danceyogamom
There you go lumping all christians together... Its the most diverse religon on earth, and yet everybody likes to make lump statements about it...Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
I didn't say all Christians, I said "Christian fundemntalists" (look up fundamentalist you don't know what it means). More specifically, I'm refereing to they type of fundementalists who want to impose there way of life and thinking on everyone else. I have no problem if someone is super religious, I think it's great. But I have a problem when senators or religious groups start going after Howard Stern, and now I'm gonna have to pay to listen to him. I mean these guys were about to go after the porn industry before 9/11. As a matter of fact, there going after porn right now. I didn't lump all Christians togther, i just critized the ones who claim to be morally superior than all of us and want to impose there views on society.Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetlemming
I'm aware of those beliefs, and I disagree with them.Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
however, I also happen to be a Christian, and I felt your original statement suggested all Christians felt that way.
Do you agree that the world was created in 7 days, and that man and women where created right after?Quote:
Originally Posted by danceyogamom
To me, in religion, you either take the whole cake or not at all
And don't get me wrong, I'm not insulting you or anyone who is religous. I'm very religious myself. What I'm saying is, I don't appreciate someone imposing there religious beliefs on me.
The wonderful thing about Christianity is that there pretty much is no whole cake you've got to force down. There are so many sects and different enitities that you can have your own beliefs and not have everything decided for you. There are Christians (for the most part, it's the Protestant sects that offer all the diversity) that believe in science, that believe in evolution (as a tool of God), there are Chirstians that believe in (gasp!) free speech. The "whole cake" for Christianity is just belief in God, his power, and Jesus as the messiah. That is the absolute only lump statement you can make about Christians, because it's far too diverse a group to get anything else that fits every one of them (even the "fundamentalists").
I think the question is ... how can a mere mortal like me possibly grasp the concept of time as it applies to God?Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
a day to me is 24 hours. There have been several different measurements of time throughout humanity's history ... why would God be on the same time clock as DYM, living in the central time zone?
Moses lived to be over 500 ... but of course, they measured their years differently.
stories have been used as teaching tools for as long as humanity has been communicating. Aesop's lessons are no less valuable even if the story itself isn't 100% true.
no different with Genesis.
very good point, but you belive that dinosours existed? or that evolution occured? cuz supposedly God created man right after earthQuote:
Originally Posted by danceyogamom
and also, there are factual errors in the bible. there were no slaves in Egypt and the egyptian army was never destroyed.
:jesusdanc ...:jesusdanc ...:jesusdanc
of course I believe in dinosaurs. I use fossil fuels don't I?Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosophyGenius
I'm Catholic, not a fundamentalist. I don't take the bible literally, it isn't part of the Catholic dogma. (I should also state here that I don't believe in a huge amount of Catholic dogma either. Most of the rules were made by men to suit their own purposes. They have little to do with God or the teachings of Jesus)
of course there are factual errors in the bible ... most people don't consider the politial motivations behind compiling the books.
originally every tribe had an arc, and there was a political advantage to change it to one arc - so the language of the testament was changed in order to suit the needs of the time.
this happens throughout the bible.
Jesus wasn't born on December 25. It was already a large holy day and co-opting the day and some of the rituals convinced more Gentiles to convert. Same thing with Easter.
The Virgin Mary was made into a much bigger symbol as Christianity moved through Europe to attract the mother goddess worshipers.
books were left out of the new testament because they didn't suit the ideals of a unified church. specific concepts from the old testament were made more prominent, as other concepts were downplayed.
it is all about cultural, political and power developments of the church and society
Good points, you certainly know your stuff. But back to my original argument:Quote:
Originally Posted by danceyogamom
I don't want religious politicians and judges imposing there religious views on me and many people agree with that. I don't want creationsim taught in science classes along with evolution. I don't want religious groups or senators telling me what is indecent based on there supposledly high moral standards. And I'm sure you agree with me on this, that it's certainly not right how gays are unfairly bashed and told there sinners. I mean there's even a group called "God hates fags".
Most of all, I really don't appreciate how religious fundementalist are telling people like me that I'm gonna go to hell because I don't belive in Jesus or thier God. It doesnt neccessaraly piss me off, but I just think that they feel there better and morally superior than everyone else when there really not. Everyone is equal no matter what religion.
I'm sure you feel me on that
P.S. I dont think being a Christian (or being a religious person) mean your automatically a fundementalist
http://dictionary.reference.com/sear...fundamentalist
Fundamentalist:
- A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition to secularism.
- <LI type=a>often Fundamentalism An organized, militant Evangelical movement originating in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th century in opposition to Protestant Liberalism and secularism, insisting on the inerrancy of Scripture.
- Adherence to the theology of this movement