Discipline Urged For CIA Officials Over 9/11
Discipline urged for CIA officials over Sept. 11
Senior officials should be held accountable for intel failures, watchdog says
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9078880/
Updated: 8:35 p.m. ET Aug. 25, 2005
WASHINGTON - The CIA’s independent watchdog has recommended disciplinary reviews for current and former officials who were involved in failed intelligence efforts before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Associated Press has learned.
CIA Director Porter Goss now must decide whether the disciplinary proceedings go forward.
The proceedings, formally called an accountability board, were recommended by the CIA inspector general, John Helgerson. It remains unclear which people are identified for the accountability boards in the highly classified report spanning hundreds of pages. The report was delivered to Congress Tuesday night.
Following a two-year review into what went wrong before the suicide hijackings, people familiar with the report say Helgerson harshly criticizes a number of the agency’s most senior officials. Among them are former CIA Director George Tenet, former clandestine service chief Jim Pavitt and former counterterrorism center head Cofer Black. The former officials are likely candidates for proceedings before an accountability board.
The boards could take a number of actions, including letters of reprimand or dismissal. They could also clear them of wrongdoing.
Those who discussed the report with the AP all spoke on condition of anonymity because it remains highly classified and has been distributed only to a small circle in Washington.
Tenet and Pavitt declined to comment. Black could not be reached Thursday.
Goss may not follow through
Those who know Goss well question whether the director, who took over the agency last September, will commission the disciplinary reviews.
Despite public outcries for accountability, many in the intelligence community believe Goss would be loathe to try to discipline popular former senior officials and cause unrest within the agency.
He may not want to go after less senior people still in the CIA’s employ. Intelligence veterans say these CIA employees are the government’s mostly highly trained in counterterrorism and, before the Sept. 11 attacks, devoted their time to trying to stop al-Qaida. The hearings would force them to defend their careers rather than working against extremist groups.
In addition, the numerous investigations after Sept. 11 determined that an intelligence overhaul was essential to attack Muslim extremism.
Some Congress members — including California Rep. Jane Harman, the Intelligence Committee’s senior Democrat — are pushing for the CIA to produce a declassified version of the report so the public can debate these and other issues. Some family members of 9/11 victims have also called for the report’s immediate release.
“The findings in this report must be shared with all members of Congress and with the American public to ensure that the problems identified are addressed and corrected, thus moving to restore faith in this agency,” a group called Sept. 11 Advocates said in a statement Thursday.
The final version comes after much internal debate at the CIA and new national intelligence director’s office about whether to simply scrap the document because it looks backward and is so harsh, said one official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
‘Absolutely no efforts to kill it’
Beth Marple, spokeswoman for National Intelligence Director John Negroponte, said, “As expected, there has been discussion between Director Negroponte and Director Goss about this report. But there were absolutely no efforts to kill it.”
The CIA declined to comment on the substance of the report.
Accountability boards are normally made up of top CIA officials. In the case of the most serious issues, it would not be unusual for the agency’s No. 3, the executive director, to lead the proceedings.
People familiar with the inspector general’s process said the document largely covers ground already plowed in the 9/11 commission’s report and a House-Senate inquiry that issued its own report on the attacks in December 2002. Those 37 Congress members requested the inspector general’s review to consider issues of accountability.
Among items that received significant attention in the past: the CIA’s failure to put two known operatives, Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, on government watchlists and to let the FBI know that the future hijackers had entered the United States.
The new report, however, comes at the events from a different perspective, focusing more narrowly on the agency’s performance.
© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
