NYT Reporter Breaks Silence In CIA Probe Case; Possible Indictments?

NYT reporter breaks silence in CIA probe case

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050930/pl_nm/bush_leak_dc

By Adam Entous
51 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ending her standoff with federal prosecutors after nearly three months in jail, New York Times reporter Judith Miller appeared before a federal grand jury on Friday investigating who leaked a covert CIA operative's identity.

Miller agreed to break her silence and testify after receiving what she described as a voluntary and personal waiver of confidentiality from her source, identified as Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis Libby.

Lawyers close to the case said Miller's testimony appeared to clear the way for prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to wrap up his 2-year-old inquiry into who in the Bush administration leaked CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity and whether any laws were violated.

With Miller's testimony, lawyers said, Fitzgerald could move quickly to bring indictments in the case. Or he may conclude that no crime was committed and end his investigation and possibly issue a report on his findings.

The outcome could shake up the Bush White House, already reeling from criticism over its response to Hurricane Katrina and Wednesday's indictment of House Republican leader Tom DeLay.

The leak investigation has ensnarled President George W. Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, as well as Libby. The White House had long maintained that they had nothing to do with the leak.

Miller, who was sent to jail on July 6 although she never wrote an article about the Plame matter, had no comment before entering the federal court house on Friday morning to begin her testimony.

RELEASE
On Thursday, she was released from the Alexandria Detention Center outside Washington after she and her lawyers had reached agreement with Fitzgerald about the scope of her testimony.

Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride said on behalf of Libby: "It's an ongoing investigation and one in which we are fully cooperating."

Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, said: "This doesn't involve Karl and he has not been contacted" by Fitzgerald.

Legal sources close to the case said Miller was under growing pressure to testify because Fitzgerald could have sought to impose a stiffer criminal sentence against her.

A spokesman for Fitzgerald declined to comment. Fitzgerald had indicated earlier this year that he could wrap up his investigation once he obtained the testimony of Miller, lawyers involved in the case said.

Fitzgerald had already secured the cooperation of Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper, who agreed to testify after saying he received the "express personal consent" of his source to reveal his identity.

Cooper told the grand jury that Rove was the first person to tell him about Plame, although Cooper said Rove did not disclose her name. Cooper said he also discussed her and her husband, former diplomat Joseph Wilson, with Libby.

Syndicated newspaper columnist Robert Novak first revealed Plame's identity in a column on July 14, 2003, citing two administration officials, shortly after Wilson, on July 14, published an opinion piece in The New York Times that accused the administration of twisting intelligence on Iraq.

According to the Times, Miller met with Libby on July 8, 2003 and talked with him by telephone later that week.

Plame's husband has long asserted the leak was meant to discredit him for criticizing Bush's Iraq policy in 2003 after a CIA-funded trip to investigate whether Niger helped supply nuclear materials to Baghdad.

After initially promising to fire anyone found to have leaked information in the case, Bush in July offered a more qualified pledge: "If someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration."

Prominent Democrats have called on Bush to fire Rove, the architect of his two presidential election victories and now his deputy chief of staff, or block his access to classified information.

Rove's attorneys said Rove did nothing wrong.