It's An American Issue

It's An American Issue

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd151.htm

By: Devvy
January 2, 2006

"They (in Saudi Arabia) have a saying, My father rode a camel, I drive a car, my son rides in a jet airplane - his son will ride a camel." Page 31, Crossing the Rubicon

I get e-mail from Bush supporters all the time accusing me of being a liberal and that I surely must have voted for John Kerry, whose political ideology is communism. My December 30, 2005, WND column brought roughly 50 e-mails calling me every name in the book, saying I don't know what I'm talking about regarding the unlawful invasion of Iraq, I must be a flaming liberal, I hate our military, and on and on and on. The theme is the same: if you don't support Bush's agenda, you're soft on terrorism, you hate our military, you’re a liberal and, you surely must have wanted Saddam Hussein to stay in power. If you don't support the agenda of the Democratic Party, you are a right wing whatever who wants old people starving in the streets, and you want to take away a woman's "right" to kill her unborn children.

Yep, I sure am a flaming liberal. I hate abortion. I have been writing about the dangers of the toxic sodomite deathstyle for a decade. I walked away from the Republican Party in '96. I kept listening to their BS after the phony “Republican revolution” when they took control of Congress in ’95. I finally came to the conclusion that their agenda was the same as the Democratic Party, they just package and sell the same lies under different rhetoric.

Since the Republicans took control of Congress, they have not eliminated one unconstitutional law or treaty – not one. They have not removed one federal judge destroying our rights. Not one. I have been chronicling the actions of both the Democratic and Republican parties for more than a decade. Those in denial will continue to call me names, but it will not change hard, documented facts.

I don't call Bush president because I didn't vote for him; I voted for Michael Peroutka of the Constitution Party. I have no respect for George Bush who continues to trash the Constitution and Bill of Rights – all in the name of the “war on terrorism.” President Teddy Roosevelt stated it well on May 7, 1918, when he said (in part): "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

I believe in this republic and am deeply saddened that tens of millions of Americans are either willfully blind or simply care nothing for the sacrifices made by so many that gave us freedom. So many Americans are in denial, they willfully believe lies because they cannot and will not accept the documented truth about their party favorite, Democrat or Republican.

No writer can please everyone all the time. A difference of opinions and different ideas in the marketplace of public discussion is a good thing. I only ask people to do as I have done over the past 16 years: do the research, get the facts. I have read more treaties and pieces of legislation than most members of Congress. I have read more books, fully documented, than 99.9999% of the people who send me nasty, in denial e-mail.

The issue of Iraq isn't about being a Democrat, Republican or member of any political party. It's an American issue. Those not in denial, know Saddam Hussein was not a threat to these united States of America. He was a broken tin-pot dictator who had no intention of lobbing nukes at the U.S. Bush's unconstitutional invasion of Iraq has nothing to do with liberating the Iraqi people. Let me quote again Jeri Lynn Ball, author of The Great Communitarian Hoax, The Voices of America's Destruction, Master's of Seduction and Time Bomb:

"In Stalin's Russia, notes Mikahil Heller, enemies were blamed for everything; they were used to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968) and the invasion of Afghanistan in 1980. The Soviet Communists were thus able to manipulate Soviet citizens into supporting government hunts for "terrorists," "traitors," and spies, for "liberation wars" for humanity. Using Marxist-Leninist strategies, the Russian, Chinese and U.S. ruling elites have sought to frighten Americans and other populaces with the specter of ruthless mass terror. They have created enemies and blamed them for everything including terrorist acts. They have used them to justify the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, and other countries and to manipulate Americans into supporting government hunts in the exact same manner as the Communist Russians. Their aim is to manipulate whole populations into supporting "wars of national liberation" and achieving not only the sovietization of "liberated" undeveloped countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, but also the full altruization and sovietization of the United States and other Western nations.

"On September 20, 2001, President Bush said, "Americans are asking: Who attacked our country? The evidence we have gathers all points to ...al Qaeda...This group and its leader - a person named Osama bin Laden - are linked to many other organizations in different countries...There are thousands of these terrorists in more than 60 countries. They are recruited from their own nations...and brought to camps in places like Afghanistan, where they are trained in the tactics of terrors. They are sent...to hide in countries around the world to plot evil and destruction."

"The Russian and Communist Chinese have been arming and inciting "wars of national liberation" for years. On September 14, 2002, Bush, Jr., said, "...Saddam Hussein's regime has proven itself a grave and gathering danger...We must stand up for our security...The world community must do so, as well." Globlalist communitarians including America's leaders deliberately built up Saddam Hussein's regime, then sought to "liberate" Iraq.

"By waging the "battle of Iraq" and by preparing our future battles in the ongoing "war against terrorism," the globalist elites have been able to carry forward their chief goals. First, in Iraq, Americans once again were manipulated into fighting a "war of national liberation" and helping an "oppressed people." On April 5, 2003, Bush, Jr., said, "...liberation is coming. The people of Iraq have my pledge: Out fighting forces will press on until their oppressors are gone." Second, globalists have been able to implement their plans for the sovietization of the Iraqi society. On May 1, 2003, Bush, Jr., declared, "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended...And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country." On May 3, 2003, Bush, Jr., said, "Our coalition has much work to do in Iraq...We are helping to rebuild Iraq..." The Socialist/Communist coalition has justified its programs and policies on ideological grounds, holding that its aims are to liberate and improve man and society. Then it proceeds to instill Soviet communitarian ideology and community values into the masses."

This is what the war in Iraq is about:

"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge ... Iraq itself controls some 10 percent of the world's proven oil reserves ... We cannot permit a resource so vital to be dominated by one so ruthless. And we won't ... At this very moment, they (our soldiers) serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That's why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun." Bush (41), speech on Iraqi aggression in the Persian Gulf, Sept. 11, 1990

As for 9/11: Why do hundreds of family members who lost sons, brothers, fathers, husbands, sisters, cousins, wives – why do they not believe the government's version of 9/11? Are all these people wackos? Part of a “left” or “right” wing conspiracy?

There is far, far more to 9/11 and the justification of the illegal invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq than the average American can even imagine. As much as I know took me 18 months after 9/11 to get out of denial. There were too many unanswered questions and once I began the hard research, I got sick to my soul. While I have read every book out there on 9/11, in my humble opinion the only two books every American should read about 9/11 are Crossing the Rubicon by Michael Ruppert and The Terror Timeline by Paul Thompson.

I also strongly recommend you get the DVD of the McKinney briefing on 9/11 which includes wives and mothers whose husbands and sons died on that day. I watched this event on C-SPAN and, quite frankly, it was shocking and beyond disturbing. The families of those murdered have done the most extraordinary and exhaustive investigations into 9/11. What they have found is ugly, but it is the truth and all Americans should want the truth over comfortable lies.

Crossing the Rubicon has sold more than 100,000 copies, second only to the Kean cover up Commission Report on 9/11. Crossing the Rubicon is 564 pages, but has 900 foot notes to back up everything in the book. It is one of the most thoroughly researched books I have ever read and believe me, I didn't want to read it, but I had to in order to make sure in my own mind. If the families who have suffered so much don't believe the government, what does that tell you? For part 2 click below.

I can only say that if people are not willing to look at ALL the information, documentation and data on any issue, how can they blast other Americans who have done the research and call them ugly names? If you won't take the time to read books like Crossing the Rubicon, which is an amazing and horrifying piece of research, how can you call your fellow Americans all kinds of nasty and unflattering names because they have looked at all sides of an issue? How can you make an informed decision on something as horrific as 9/11 and Iraq, if the only information/data you have is opinions from Kerry, Bush, Rush or Shawn? It's human nature to cling to a comfortable illusion, but it's also dividing Americans at a time when we should be a nation united.

"There are some who, uh, feel like that, you know, the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is: Bring 'em on. We got the force necessary to deal with the security situation. “ - George W. Bush, July 2, 2003.

What is happening right now isn't a matter of how much "butt" our troops can kick in Iraq. Our military are the finest and we support them 100%. However, a foreign policy based on lies puts our military in harm's way instead of having them home on U.S. soil as our first line of defense. It is not and never has been (until the US unconstitutionally joined the communist UN) the responsibility of our military to remove dictators around the world in any country or meddle in the squabbles of foreign countries. If this were the case, we would have already invaded communist China and Russia - the two biggest terrorist host countries on this globe.

Let me enlighten the American people about a few facts and please bear in mind: I do not belong to any group or organization, not moveon.org or any others. I do not give money or support to any of these groups or organizations. I seek only the truth and demand that my government come clean and operate within the constraints set forth in the U.S. Constitution.

How many Americans have any idea about the use of chemical weapons in Iraq? How many Americans have any idea what happened when our soldiers came back from Gulf War I? If you think the video of the commie Chinese skinning dogs and cats alive was bad, viewing a video of humans scorched by chemical weapons is enough to drive anyone to rivers of tears.

Here are a few statistics that Americans might find shocking, see Ruppert's site:

"Out of the 580,400 soldiers who served in GW1 (the first Gulf War), of them, 11,000 are now dead! By the year 2000, there were 325,000 on Permanent Medical Disability. This astounding number of ‘Disabled Vets’ means that a decade later, 56% of those soldiers who served have some form of permanent medical problems! The disability rate for the wars of the last century was 5 percent; it was higher, 10 percent, in Viet Nam.

“The VA Secretary (Principi) was aware of this fact as far back as [A. D.] 2000,” wrote Bernklau. “He, and the Bush administration have been hiding these facts, but now, thanks to Moret’s report, (it) ... is far too big to hide or to cover up!”

“Terry Jamison, Public Affairs Specialist, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Department of Veterans Affairs, at the VA Central Office, recently reported that ‘Gulf Era Veterans’ now on medical disability, since 1991, number 518,739 Veterans,” said Berklau.

“The long-term effects have revealed that DU (uranium oxide) is a virtual death sentence,” stated Berklau. “Marion Fulk, a nuclear physical chemist, who retired from the Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab, and was also involved with the Manhattan Project, interprets the new and rapid malignancies in the soldiers (from the 2003 Iraq War) as ‘spectacular … and a matter of concern!’”

When asked if the main purpose of using DU was for “destroying things and killing people,” Fulk was more specific: “I would say it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people!”

End Part I