Should We Unify To Demand A Record Of Verified Disinformation?
This thread progressively consolidates perspectives developed on the thread, "Should We Ignore or Discredit “Disinformation” in the 9/11 Movement?".
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13656
By the polling there it is clear people believe that disinformation should be discredited. This thread is an attempt to bring further, more meaningful agreement on this vital issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AuGmENTor
I pretty much agree with you, cotton. But how, once you have discredited someone, do you distance yourself from them? You can be a self claimed truther. If one of them gets onto major media, there is no way to distance them. People see them holding forth on their beliefs, and they are automatically lumped in with us. Thats why these people are in such a pole position to hurt the movement. I see no winning answer to this. However, being a self-claimed dumbass, I just know someone will have a good answer. I'm still waiting to hear from a few of our regulars on this.
Excellent point. In fact the purpose of this poll and thread is to show that the point IS understood as well as vital if indeed the truth movement is ever going to get past the current status.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cottonzway
You (we, us) distance ourselves AS FAR AWAY as we all can from people like this! What I really would like is the "media" (the few we have) that covers this lies of 9/11 to come out strongly against the opinions of these viruses to the movement. Guys like Michael Wolsey, Dan Abrhamson, and Alex Jones. I know in my heart we are going to see the "space beam people" on FOX at sometime, and then what? If we don't come out and call a spade a spade WE will be grouped with these people among the mainstream, like it or not. I don't like it so I want to expose them, call them on their lies or total nonsense science and distance myself as far away as I can from people like that. On record. That way when they do try to sell BS "theories" to the mainstream I am on record calling them frauds just like the average joe who will do the same.
I agree. But how do "we" become a "we"? Where do "we" consolidate our knowledge?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BASE701
I think there should be a set of ideas agreed upon among the majority of the truth movement. Anything outside those parameters should be discussed as theory only.
This movement needs to become more cohesive IMO.
Yes, and this thread is an attempt to show how it might coalesce into greater unity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gold9472
How about, discredit, denounce, and move on?
As a personal action, I totally agree. However, where does the record of the discrediting get displayed? Who keeps track of it and how do they do it? Who and how is it verified?
It seems the different non profit 9-11 truth orgs should agree or designate upon a place/time/method to, log and consolidate the verified and rational discreditings of bogus conjecture/theory/information, then share a link on their website, near the top, to the accumulated debunkings where newbies can find out what is bunk so they don't go out and inadvertantly support it, or fail to "move on".
This is a vital aspect of the movement and one that leadership should be dealing with and it is not. WHY? This is fairly obvious strategy and obvious to any who are serious. Do these orgazations communicate with one another? Share information?
If they don't, I consider it incompetent and if indeed we believe in "discredit, denounce, and move on" as a priority when it comes to forms of disinfo, we should first get active on gaining rational, competent performance from the various non profits that enjoy a tax exemption for the purposes of pursuing a functional movement.
Accordingly, the poll question is;
"Should the 9-11 truth movement, the American citizens concerned with the erosion or subversion of their Constitution in the post 9-11 environment of non accountability, organize to demand that 9-11 non profits reasonably unify to create and keep current a record of competently "debunked", "discredited" and absurd theories or information, misinformation and disinformation?
