Bumpity Bump Bump, Bumpity Bump.
Reply please.
:)
Bumpity Bump Bump, Bumpity Bump.
Reply please.
:)
You're trying to say that treasonous activity (keeping in mind that not everything Sibel knows has been cited by the London Times) is acceptable or "begets legality, even retroactively" if that treasonous activity is necessary.
I don't agree with that statement. Treason is never necessary. That's why they call it treason.