What Are The Top Stories, To You, On This Site, That Shows Government Complicity?

Gold9472

Gold9472

Tired...
Staff member
What Are The Top Stories, To You, On This Site, That Shows Government Complicity?

In both the "9/11 Truther Forum", and the "New News" Forum, there is a PLETHORA of information that shows complicity. What do you think are some of the best ones?
 
I've always thought 9/11 Truth is like a puzzle because each fact can easily be rebuttled. But if you look at all of the pieces togther, you have a clear picture that is undeniable.

But the biggest pieces of the puzzle would have to be building 7 and the lack of plane damage that occured at the pentagon.
 
PhilosophyGenius said:
I've always thought 9/11 Truth is like a puzzle because each fact can easily be rebuttled. But if you look at all of the pieces togther, you have a clear picture that is undeniable.

But the biggest pieces of the puzzle would have to be building 7 and the lack of plane damage that occured at the pentagon.
Click to expand...
When it comes to proving guilt, its always a preponderance of the evidence, not one thing in particular. Make no mistake, if this thing ever goes to trial, it won't take long for the perpetrators to be fried.
 
A few of my favorites...

National Security Experts Censored By The 9/11 Commission
Click Here

Rep. Curt Weldon Ask For A Criminal Investigation Regarding 9/11 - Video Inside
Click Here

In The Name Of Sibel Edmonds - Video Inside
Click Here

Inspector General Finds Sibel Edmonds Firing Wrong
Click Here

Important "Open Letter To Norman Mineta" Concerning His 9/11 Comm. Censored Testimony
Click Here

'I Saw Papers That Show US Knew Al-Qa'ida Would Attack Cities With Airplanes'
Click Here

Amy Goodman Interviews Sibel Edmonds About Dennis Hastert
Click Here

Bush Asks Daschle To limit 9/11 Probes
Click Here

PNAC 101 - Rise Of The Neocons
Click Here

Leo Strauss' Philosophy Of Deception
Click Here

There's SO MUCH INFORMATION ON THIS SITE!!! :)
 
No doubt--there's more good information collected here than anywhere else I know of.

Remember, if this were a jury trial, they'd only have to prove 'reasonable doubt' to get off. But for us, we have to come up with 'undeniable, beyond-question proof' to even get heard... It's a struggle, to be sure. Imagine, though, one compelling collection of evidence (like www.justicefor911.org) that would actually be heard/read/seen by a majority of Americans. Surely, it wouldn't take long then...

Personally, my basic question is still the same, and still very bottom line:
How did some former CIA-agent (funded by the US and thus obviously watched every second) on dialysis in a cave coordinate 19 young lap-dancing, cocaine-snorting, pork-eating A-rab "Islamic Fundamentalists who hate our freedom" with boxcutters to totally, completely render inoperative the most expensive military in the entire world?

Can't happen. Period. Didn't happen. Not even in a Tom Clancy novel could he pull that shit off!

Right there's the bottom line. That is enough for treason and murder, utter failure by the Commander in Chief, impeachment, indictment, hanged by the neck until dead...When the trial for treason begins, all the physical evidence will come out... beginning with demolitions and ending with Flt 93 shoot-down. And then we can find out what happened to the people, and why so many of Raytheon's scientists were on the planes, and why they can't come up with passenger or 'hijacker' DNA when they can produce passports, and what the blackboxes recorded, and...

Then, we can follow-up with why they let all those rescue-workers and local residents be exposed to obviously lethal environment that is now literally killing them and no one cares...

Then, people will QUIT trusting "authority" and remember they have a responsibility to their Republic if they don't want to live in a tyrannical dictatorship.

Then we'll all live happily ever after ;)
 
MamaSez said:
No doubt--there's more good information collected here than anywhere else I know of.

Remember, if this were a jury trial, they'd only have to prove 'reasonable doubt' to get off. But for us, we have to come up with 'undeniable, beyond-question proof' to even get heard... It's a struggle, to be sure. Imagine, though, one compelling collection of evidence (like www.justicefor911.org) that would actually be heard/read/seen by a majority of Americans. Surely, it wouldn't take long then...

Personally, my basic question is still the same, and still very bottom line:
How did some former CIA-agent (funded by the US and thus obviously watched every second) on dialysis in a cave coordinate 19 young lap-dancing, cocaine-snorting, pork-eating A-rab "Islamic Fundamentalists who hate our freedom" with boxcutters to totally, completely render inoperative the most expensive military in the entire world?

Can't happen. Period. Didn't happen. Not even in a Tom Clancy novel could he pull that shit off!

Right there's the bottom line. That is enough for treason and murder, utter failure by the Commander in Chief, impeachment, indictment, hanged by the neck until dead...When the trial for treason begins, all the physical evidence will come out... beginning with demolitions and ending with Flt 93 shoot-down. And then we can find out what happened to the people, and why so many of Raytheon's scientists were on the planes, and why they can't come up with passenger or 'hijacker' DNA when they can produce passports, and what the blackboxes recorded, and...

Then, we can follow-up with why they let all those rescue-workers and local residents be exposed to obviously lethal environment that is now literally killing them and no one cares...

Then, people will QUIT trusting "authority" and remember they have a responsibility to their Republic if they don't want to live in a tyrannical dictatorship.

Then we'll all live happily ever after ;)
Click to expand...
great post!!!!
 
MamaSez said:
No doubt--there's more good information collected here than anywhere else I know of.

Remember, if this were a jury trial, they'd only have to prove 'reasonable doubt' to get off. But for us, we have to come up with 'undeniable, beyond-question proof' to even get heard... It's a struggle, to be sure. Imagine, though, one compelling collection of evidence (like www.justicefor911.org) that would actually be heard/read/seen by a majority of Americans. Surely, it wouldn't take long then...

Personally, my basic question is still the same, and still very bottom line:
How did some former CIA-agent (funded by the US and thus obviously watched every second) on dialysis in a cave coordinate 19 young lap-dancing, cocaine-snorting, pork-eating A-rab "Islamic Fundamentalists who hate our freedom" with boxcutters to totally, completely render inoperative the most expensive military in the entire world?

Can't happen. Period. Didn't happen. Not even in a Tom Clancy novel could he pull that shit off!

Right there's the bottom line. That is enough for treason and murder, utter failure by the Commander in Chief, impeachment, indictment, hanged by the neck until dead...When the trial for treason begins, all the physical evidence will come out... beginning with demolitions and ending with Flt 93 shoot-down. And then we can find out what happened to the people, and why so many of Raytheon's scientists were on the planes, and why they can't come up with passenger or 'hijacker' DNA when they can produce passports, and what the blackboxes recorded, and...

Then, we can follow-up with why they let all those rescue-workers and local residents be exposed to obviously lethal environment that is now literally killing them and no one cares...

Then, people will QUIT trusting "authority" and remember they have a responsibility to their Republic if they don't want to live in a tyrannical dictatorship.

Then we'll all live happily ever after ;)
Click to expand...

You go girlfriend!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top