PDA

View Full Version : History Of The 9/11 Truth Movement



Gold9472
09-25-2005, 10:26 PM
History of the 9/11 Truth Movement

A movement is similar to a river: dozens of tributaries, hundreds of streams, and thousands of rivulets, all converging together. Tracing a river’s source to a single location is thus impossible. Mapping a movement is more like charting a whole river basin than following a simple stream uphill. As we look at the movement, then, it is not so much a singular thing as a many-pronged flow over complex terrain.

The 911 Truth Movement emerged in a time when America’s leadership in the world inspires very mixed feelings. America simultaneously stands for much that is noble and just while also acting as an unaccountable empire. Many patriotic Americans – and the rest of the world as well – are hungry for America to outgrow its Machiavellian power maneuvers and aggressive unilateralism, standing again on the principled freedoms that are built into its foundations.

On this terrain, the storm of the events of 9/11 poured a rain of death, anger, fear, and grief. This stirred compassion, as even the French declared, “We are all Americans.” The vast majority of people felt this to be the tragedy it appeared to be: terrorists versus empire, with many innocent civilians caught in the crossfire. The Bush administration used this attack as an excuse for invading Afghanistan and Iraq while diminishing rights at home and undermining treaty after treaty. In the wake of America’s grief, many tolerated these maneuvers. America was justified, it seemed, in striking out at the terrorists who had struck on its own land.

What if, though, it turns out that the official story of 9/11 is not the true story? What if hundreds of unexplained facts that have slowly accumulated point to something decidedly darker – a deceit on an almost unprecedented scale?

What if forces within America’s own government were complicit, or, even worse, involved in orchestrating the “attacks,” to give carte blanche for a program of military dominance, economic exploitation, and domestic control?

For most, this is, at first, an almost unthinkable thought. It shakes bedrock foundations and beliefs. And yet, the preponderance of unexplained facts points to just that view of the events of 9/11. It is the discovery, accumulation, and analysis of these unexplained facts that have gradually brought together tens of thousands of people into a movement.

The majority of people in the movement did not smell deceit on that fateful day, but some did. Where were the fighter planes, they wondered? Why was Bush behaving in such a bizarre fashion, listening to the story of a pet goat while the towers were in flames? Why did news reports say that Flight 93 was shot down and then change the story later? Why didn’t the Pentagon defend itself?

Most of us, however, suspected nothing. Gradually, though, anomalous evidence began to accumulate and we were exposed to it:


Building 7 of the WTC, rubbled without even being hit
Structural analyses that said the towers should not have fallen from a fire alone
Clear warnings in advance that were ignored
A pattern of secrecy, denial, and retribution for those in the FBI, CIA, and administration who warned about the pending attacks
Unusual patterns of debris, strewn over miles, making it appear that Flight 93 was shot down, despite official government reports
Insider stock trades that made millions off selling American and United short, trade whose origins were not fully investigated
Advance warnings to key politicians and business leaders not to fly that day
The quick exit of the extended Bin Laden family from the country with full governmental protection.
Families of the victims being stonewalled or silenced
Evidence that the Pakistan ISI wired $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, one of the orchestrators, right around the time ISI chief Gen. Mahmoud was meeting with American political leaders days before the attack.
Anthrax attacks of suspicious origin, putting the US Congress into a state of fear right before passage of the Patriot Act


Intrepid independent journalists, videographers, activists, and researchers began to string these pieces of evidence together, scrutinizing each to see whether they offered clues to the real truth. Families of victims banded together as they began to feel that the government wanted to silence their questions and stifle their inquiries. Websites sprang up, slowly at first, then by the dozens. Researchers began to network together. Groundbreaking videos emerged. Then books. Conferences. Legal actions. Citizen’s inquiries. Alliances.

The mainstream press is now starting to wake up to the possibility that we could have a scandal on our hands that would dwarf any previous scandal of a sitting president. Many are seeing that the prison torture scandal at Abu Ghraib, CIA leaks, and the pattern of administration secrecy and lies all point back to that fateful day of September 11th, which has been used an excuse for many breaches of honorable conduct.

In the months and years ahead, America will be challenged to reclaim the best of its ideals and take the step of looking into the shadows of American power and its relationship to the events of 9/11. Our world cannot be safe and secure until the truth is known. We ask you to study the evidence, draw your own conclusions, and spread the word that gaps, inconsistencies, and outright lies simply must be addressed for America to stand in integrity again.

The 911Truth.org website has been created by leaders from across the movement to orient people and press to the highest quality resources and to support the key efforts that are advancing the truth. Our hope is that America can use this episode as more than a pretext for unending war. May it be used for peace and the fulfillment of a nobler destiny.

PhilosophyGenius
09-26-2005, 01:56 AM
So when did you come into the picture?

Gold9472
09-26-2005, 03:03 PM
Probably... "A pattern of secrecy, denial, and retribution for those in the FBI, CIA, and administration who warned about the pending attacks"

911=inside job
09-26-2005, 06:10 PM
So when did you come into the picture?
what picture??? you mean when did he understand 911 was an inside job??? gold just figured it out 2 weeks ago...

or do you think gold is in some sort of spot light??? lol..

PhilosophyGenius
09-26-2005, 06:12 PM
what picture??? you mean when did he understand 911 was an inside job??? gold just figured it out 2 weeks ago...

or do you think gold is in some sort of spot light??? lol..

HAHA....Ya, and I'm sure you taught him everything he knows.

Gold9472
09-26-2005, 06:18 PM
What? 9/11 was an inside job? Get the fuck out of here.

911Eyewitness
09-26-2005, 06:43 PM
History of the 9/11 Truth Movement

The mainstream press is now starting to wake up to the possibility that we could have a scandal on our hands that would dwarf any previous scandal of a sitting president.

Shall we actually note a change in the press it will not be from their awakening to the facts, it will come from their awakening to the danger of being wiped out for being such traitors and frauds.

The press is owned by the same powers that push the rest of the buttons. Murdock (FOX and all your news rags). Hurst (does he not control half of the US reads?), Rockfeller (NBC OIL Chicago Bank IMF WorldBanks), these are some of the beneficiaries of the demolition of the Towers as well as the major press.

Know your enemy in all his faces. There are key things to watch for, thinking that the major media is a "free press" is want for proof. Individual humans may strive for higher moral values, but a corporation cannot.

Gold9472
09-26-2005, 06:51 PM
The press has woken up to a certain extent. Granted, not all are friendly, but some outlets are. The Village Voice, Hustler Magazine, and a few others I'm not remembering at the moment. Local news has been friendly. My own local paper has been posting a few "9/11 Truth" articles. The Philadelphia Daily News has posted a few "9/11 Truth" articles as well.

Now, are they covering it as they should? ABSOLUTELY not. Are MSNBC, CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, etc... covering it at all? ABSOLUTELY not. At least NOT past "Able Danger". And even regarding "Able Danger", they're "back-offish".

911=inside job
09-26-2005, 06:52 PM
Shall we actually note a change in the press it will not be from their awakening to the facts, it will come from their awakening to the danger of being wiped out for being such traitors and frauds.

The press is owned by the same powers that push the rest of the buttons. Murdock (FOX and all your news rags). Hurst (does he not control half of the US reads?), Rockfeller (NBC OIL Chicago Bank IMF WorldBanks), these are some of the beneficiaries of the demolition of the Towers as well as the major press.

Know your enemy in all his faces. There are key things to watch for, thinking that the major media is a "free press" is want for proof. Individual humans may strive for higher moral values, but a corporation cannot.
i hear ya... im a bummer but i sure dont see the light at the end of the tunnel... i wish i did!!! i wish i thought that the dems had a chance in 08 but i dont... and even if they do get in, will they do anything but slow shit down like clinton did???? this is not the country i thought it was 6 years ago.....

Gold9472
09-26-2005, 06:55 PM
And let's not forget C-SPAN...

911=inside job
09-26-2005, 06:56 PM
oh, and welcome 911 eyewitness!!!!! i hope we arent to rough for you....lol

somebigguy
09-26-2005, 08:53 PM
oh, and welcome 911 eyewitness!!!!! i hope we arent to rough for you....lol
Hey Inside Job, what happened to your buddy that showed up last week? We we too rough for him?

Gold9472
09-26-2005, 09:54 PM
Hey Inside Job, what happened to your buddy that showed up last week? We we too rough for him?

Uppy?

somebigguy
09-26-2005, 09:59 PM
I think we scared him off, those Bay Area guys are kinda soft.

Gold9472
09-26-2005, 10:02 PM
I think we scared him off, those Bay Area guys are kinda soft.

Yeah, and not too bright.

PhilosophyGenius
09-26-2005, 11:14 PM
"I think we scared him off, those Bay Area guys are kinda soft."

"Yeah, and not too bright."

:bigcrying

911Eyewitness
09-27-2005, 09:54 AM
i hear ya... im a bummer but i sure dont see the light at the end of the tunnel... i wish i did!!! i wish i thought that the dems had a chance in 08 but i dont... and even if they do get in, will they do anything but slow shit down like clinton did???? this is not the country i thought it was 6 years ago.....

Well, if you were referring to the Democratic Party in the United States I would refer you to the fact that is still in the corporate law stuff and not restoring any representative, responsible government. That is why change is not effected either way.

Light at the end of the tunnel? Yeah, what the hell? That is what we have a problem figuring out. Isn’t it? Right now though I have to try and direct your attention to the facts that the parties are really the same, just dressed in different cloths so you can pick one of the winning teams, and they still win. NEVER throw your vote away on the wish and dreamland offerings outside what is presented, that is what the mind is presented through your programmed news.The 2 parties are no light at the end of the tunnel and no solution to our problems.

I have to admit I worked in the media industry and moving minds is a simple matter made so much easier with money. But just media can do it. Colors alone can drive you to actions and I taught professors at Parsons how to do it and went on to tutor the major media outlets in the art. It is a living. We are so surrounded by media programming, it is awe inspiring in its grandeur, yet scary to someone who sees what is happening with it. Some of my producers are fans of Jay Leno, and I showed them how subversive his humor was. They taped me covertly talking about it and it will be part of something they do.

As far as some news,"village voice" is sort of not mainstream. Are they starting to ask, well, as I said, they must start to move in direct proportion to the threat of remaining on the losing side. Did I get that out right? Put in their shoes, would you want to remain loyal to the boss if the crowd gets too big at the door? It would be reasonable to allow the masses their small presses to expound this idea, as a release. Only those already partly or out of the "program" read them anyway. Major news has not budged; they really are the same people at the wheels. Even if a moralistic writer had some singe of remorse, he can’t get it printed, and risks losing position and wealth. He must just move to freedom papers and leave that big mortgage, trophy wife etc. They have golden chains for them. We get the tin ribbed iron ones.


Do you think Bush will allow an election?

Gold9472
11-27-2005, 01:48 PM
bump

Dave Mann
11-27-2005, 05:01 PM
Gold - Of the press the Phil. Daily News, specifically William Bunch, stick out as the only mainstream media to touch 9-11 truth. That is even if you consider the Voice mainstream. But, interestingly they are being baught out by a huge, right Republican, entity - Bunch is trying to fight it. That should be a 9-11 truth focus. - Can't seem to find recent article by Bunch about the take -over - but here's a couple groundbreaking articles..

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/091203A.shtml

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2005/found_black_boxes.htm

Gold9472
11-27-2005, 05:06 PM
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=550
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5401

Dave Mann
11-27-2005, 05:07 PM
Something about the takeover threat here..

http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002451.html