i thought this looked fake and im not alone...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 911=inside job
  • Start date Start date
196718994_l.jpg
 
And why would the New York Police Department, one of the two organizations who lost the most people that day, endorse a photograph that is fake?
 
And if you zoom in on ANY image, you're going to see pixelation. GOD they are so stupid over there.
 
I'm just wondering.

The top photo is actually the east corner. Not sure on the other one.

But this is the SW

fig-5-17.jpg


http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

Pics of demolitions made to fall into each other.

xin_500502241017062799316.jpg


Buildings topple by explosives in Yunong Village in south China's Shenzhen on Sunday May 22, 2005. The demolition, dubbed 'China's No. 1 blast' by Hong Kong media, reportedly covered an area of 51,000 square meters (57,000 square feet) the largest ever in China. [AP/Xinhua]

200505230137_42745.jpg


200505230137_42747.jpg

200505230137_42749.jpg

200505230137_42753.jpg

200505230137_42757.jpg
 
somebigguy said:
It doesn't matter, here is what happens to buildings that suffer a structural damage of some sort:

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/buildfall6.jpg
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/buildfall2.jpg
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/buildfall7.jpg

So if some uneducated boobs are claiming this little bit of damage is responsible for the collapse, they are once again sadly misinformed.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter... it's another one of those arguments that can never be won.
 
gold, all im saying is that it sure looks fake to me.... im not the only one that thinks it looks fake....
 
on a side note, i got a dvd from reopen 911 and i loaned it out and they told me that it shows the flash...... i didnt think they would put that on their dvd... it has an hour of erics vid too... i have not seen it yet because im passing around at a store i go to all the time but ill watch it when they are done...
 
911=inside job said:
gold, all im saying is that it sure looks fake to me.... im not the only one that thinks it looks fake....
Click to expand...

I know... I showed it to my friend who is also a graphic designer (as myself), and he knows what to look for... certain blurring, etc... and there is one piece that looks like an uncommon blur, but there is also smoke so it's hard to tell.
 
ehnyah said:
I'm just wondering.

The top photo is actually the east corner. Not sure on the other one.

But this is the SW

fig-5-17.jpg


http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

Pics of demolitions made to fall into each other.

xin_500502241017062799316.jpg


Buildings topple by explosives in Yunong Village in south China's Shenzhen on Sunday May 22, 2005. The demolition, dubbed 'China's No. 1 blast' by Hong Kong media, reportedly covered an area of 51,000 square meters (57,000 square feet) the largest ever in China. [AP/Xinhua]

200505230137_42745.jpg


200505230137_42747.jpg

200505230137_42749.jpg

200505230137_42753.jpg

200505230137_42757.jpg
Click to expand...

wow, great pictures! i wish we had video of this.. i hate how so many ppl think that if a building starts falling the entire structure disentegrates.. a video of this would show pretty well how a building can maintain structural soundness even when falling.. good pics, thanks!
 
911=inside job said:
everyone at lets roll think the pic of wtc7 from the report is fake...

http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=9830

someone here said something lame to me when i said that the pic looks fake...
Click to expand...

that was me.. my bad.

i will say this though, in general modifying an image, or modifying photographic/video evidence is something most would avoid.. the main reason being that if it comes out the video/image was edited, then it would provide concrete proof of a lie..

i dont see how modifying this image solves anything, or would justifying modifying this image.. they would be taking a large risk in doing such as well..

again, sorry for my rude coments the first time.. part of it comes from the ppl i work with who swear every image that makes bush look like a moron is photoshopped..

id say it is real, unless concrete evidence could prove otherwise.. otherwise it is just a waste of time to argue over when we could be being active in getting the word out.
 
DZ

I think the video you have linked up with a prison demolition, the infamous carandiru in Brazil, is very eye opening.

In any case, Is this the sw corner?



323505.jpg


Looks like a match

323504.jpg
 
Gold9472 said:
It doesn't matter... it's another one of those arguments that can never be won.
Click to expand...
Bullshit, history is a great teacher, and history tells us that buildings don't disintegrate from structural damage or fire.
 
I think gold is talking about the *quick get the magnifying glass* pixel pushers, not structural damage.

How did the construction crew know, "keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon". lucky guess?

They tell us these are three buildings that "collapsed" from structural damage.

319612.jpg



321380.jpg
 
somebigguy said:
Bullshit, history is a great teacher, and history tells us that buildings don't disintegrate from structural damage or fire.
Click to expand...

Jesus... I'm talking about the Photo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top