PDA

View Full Version : Isn't It Ironic?



Gold9472
08-29-2011, 01:47 PM
Isn't It Ironic?

Jon Gold
8/29/2011

Sometime around March 2005, Roger "dz" Peters asked me to be a contributor to his new site, 911blogger.com. We had met on www.septembereleventh.org's forum, and he liked my posts. He also asked that my site act as a forum for this site. Essentially, I co-founded 911blogger.com. Over the years, it became the most popular "9/11 Truth" site in the world.

We used to hold fund-raisers so as to be able to post 9/11 Truth banners (http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/s720x720/v2662/187/34/684595285/n684595285_1992257_2724331.jpg) on prominent sites. The first fund-raiser (http://911blogger.com/node/4895) for 9/11 First Responders was held on 911blogger.com, as well as several others.

When "dz" decided to retire, he gave over control of the site to "Reprehensor." Not much changed as far as content. Then, when "Reprehensor" decided to retire, he gave control of the site to Justin Keogh.

Justin sits on the board of ae911truth.org. After him taking over, the emphasis on the "Controlled Demolition" of the towers and WTC7 multiplied by 1000. Something I have advocated against too many times to count. Within a day of him taking over, several of the people that were banned over the years, had their memberships reinstated. People that caused me nothing but problems, and people that promoted the crappiest of information. After many months, I stopped posting on 911blogger.com. I tried to return to the site on a few occasions, but ultimately, I asked Justin to ban my account so I would not be tempted to waste my time arguing with lunatics on that site.

On August 25th, 2011, the largest weekly paper in Philadelphia ran a story entitled, "The Truth About Truthers (http://www.citypaper.net/cover_story/2011-08-25-september-11-911-truthers-activists-philadelphia.html)." I was interviewed for the article. Overall, I think it was an extremely fair and balanced article. It showed that there are people trying desperately to maintain the credibility of this cause, and it also showed that there are people who really don't care about credibility. It shows that combining bad or crazy sounding information with good information destroys credibility. Without saying it directly, it essentially showed that the people who are combining "crap" with good information aren't told to do otherwise by the perceived "leaders" of this movement.

Again, I think it was fair and balanced.

Cosmos, the founder of the "Eleventh Day of Every Month Until Justice" action, as well as one of the founders of www.911truthnews.com (http://www.911truthnews.com), posted the CityPaper's article to 911blogger.com (http://i54.tinypic.com/2dhwjuc.jpg). For some reason, the post has not been allowed through. Cosmos sent an email asking why, and has not heard anything from anyone.

It's ironic (http://home.comcast.net/%7Egold9472/ironic.mp3) that an article that made the front page of Philadelphia's largest weekly newspaper, that just happens to mention me, a co-founder of 911blogger.com, is not allowed to be posted on 911blogger.com today.

I think the truth hurts.

orAntilogic
09-01-2011, 12:26 PM
It's both ironic and unfortunate, but thank you for detailing the events here. I've taken similar, occasional breaks from reading 911blogger as well. I didn't keep up with the changes in moderators but I definitely noticed the downgraded quality and content of the blog sufficient to occasionally lose interest.

I've read up on Kevin Fenton lately and he also pays relatively little attention to that specific allegation of controlled demolition, meanwhile providing incredible contributions otherwise. He thought the collapses seemed to have been assisted but when the research began focusing on nanothermite he basically checked out due to a lack of technical expertise.

I'm curious why you personally take issue with the controlled demolition theory. As much content as I know you've written, rather than ask you to spell it out here, could you perhaps point me in the direction of another post or blog where you've discussed your reasons previously?