PDA

View Full Version : Impeachment Time!



Good Doctor HST
05-06-2005, 07:03 PM
(Article found at Zmag.org)

Here it is. The smoking gun. The memo that has "IMPEACH HIM" written all over it.
The top-level government memo marked "SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL," dated eight months before Bush sent us into Iraq, following a closed meeting with the President, reads, "Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam through military action justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

Read that again: "The intelligence and facts were being fixed...."

For years, after each damning report on BBC TV, viewers inevitably ask me, "Isn't this grounds for impeachment?" -- vote rigging, a blind eye to terror and the bin Ladens before 9-11, and so on. Evil, stupidity and self-dealing are shameful but not impeachable. What's needed is a "high crime or misdemeanor."

And if this ain't it, nothing is.

The memo, uncovered this week by the Times, goes on to describe an elaborate plan by George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair to hoodwink the planet into supporting an attack on Iraq knowing full well the evidence for war was a phony.

A conspiracy to commit serial fraud is, under federal law, racketeering. However, the Mob's schemes never cost so many lives.

Here's more. "Bush had made up his mind to take military action. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran."

Really? But Mr. Bush told us, "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."

A month ago, the Silberman-Robb Commission issued its report on WMD intelligence before the war, dismissing claims that Bush fixed the facts with this snooty, condescending conclusion written directly to the President, "After a thorough review, the Commission found no indication that the Intelligence Community distorted the evidence regarding Iraq's weapons."

We now know the report was a bogus 618 pages of thick whitewash aimed to let Bush off the hook for his murderous mendacity.

Read on: The invasion build-up was then set, says the memo, "beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections." Mission accomplished.

You should parse the entire memo -- posted on my website -- and see if you can make it through its three pages without losing your lunch.

Now sharp readers may note they didn't see this memo, in fact, printed in the New York Times. It wasn't. Rather, it was splashed across the front pages of the Times of LONDON on Monday.

It has effectively finished the last, sorry remnants of Tony Blair's political career. (While his Labor Party will most assuredly win the elections Thursday, Prime Minister Blair is expected, possibly within months, to be shoved overboard in favor of his Chancellor of the Exchequer, a political execution which requires only a vote of the Labour party's members in Parliament.)

But in the US, barely a word. The New York Times covers this hard evidence of Bush's fabrication of a casus belli as some "British" elections story. Apparently, our President's fraud isn't "news fit to print."

My colleagues in the UK press have skewered Blair, digging out more incriminating memos, challenging the official government factoids and fibs. But in the US press nada, bubkes, zilch. Bush fixed the facts and somehow that's a story for "over there."

The Republicans impeached Bill Clinton over his cigar and Monica's affections. And the US media could print nothing else.

Now, we have the stone, cold evidence of bending intelligence to sell us on death by the thousands, and neither a Republican Congress nor what is laughably called US journalism thought it worth a second look.

My friend Daniel Ellsberg once said that what's good about the American people is that you have to lie to them. What's bad about Americans is that it's so easy to do.


-----------
Greg Palast is author of the New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. Read the memo in its entirety at www.GregPalast.com (http://www.gregpalast.com/)

You may reproduce this report without fee but with attribution.

Media requests: contact(at)gregpalast.com

Gold9472
05-06-2005, 07:08 PM
Is this the first you've heard of this?

pcteaser
05-06-2005, 07:14 PM
And you said people would see the sticky! ;)

Actually, I'm sure he's seen it, but once again we are shown how the mainstream media is dropping the ball.

Good Doctor HST
05-06-2005, 07:26 PM
Is this the first you've heard of this?

I only heard about how Tony Blair will get in trouble because of the disinformation. But, yes, this is the first I heard about the secret plans of invasion 8 months prior to the start of the Iraq invasion that was released.

pcteaser
05-06-2005, 07:35 PM
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1692

somebigguy
05-06-2005, 09:05 PM
I heard the story, but didn't read this specific article. Good find HST, don't let these naysayers get you down.

somebigguy
05-06-2005, 10:17 PM
Hey, I sent this story out to various members of the media. Here is a response I got from GreenPeace:



Dear Chris,

Please visit the following links on the Greenpeace International web site to find out the information that we made available to the public and the work that we have done to oppose the war in Iraq. Greenpeace felt that this was an important enough of an issue, even though we are more of an environmental advocacy organization, rather than an “anti-war” organization, to oppose the war in Iraq. Even though when we did it did not sit well with a number of our supporters.
One of our slogans for our campaign was “No War for Oil”, so both organizationally and individually we have some backround on the issue in a way similar to what you speak to and have brought to our attention.
It is a sad thing in this world that most, if not all wars, appear to be created for the benefit of a few select individuals. Please go to the following links on our International web site to find out the backround on the issue, from Greenpeace’s perspective:

{ HYPERLINK "http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/abolish-nuclear-weapons" }http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/abolish- nuclear-weapons

{ HYPERLINK "http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/abolish-nuclear-weapons/say-no-to-war" }http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/abolish- nuclear-weapons/say-no-to-war

{ HYPERLINK "http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/abolish-nuclear-weapons/say-no-to-war/war-on-iraq" }http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/abolish- nuclear-weapons/say-no-to-war/war-on-iraq

Thank you for bringing this aspect of the issue to our attention and if you have any questions, please let us know.


Kevin Gamble Member Services Greenpeace Canada 1-800-320-7183 www.greenpeace.ca If you would like to subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter click here: http://greenpeace.ca/e/enews/signup.html

I haven't checked out any of the links yet. One of the Greenpeace founders died this week which is a shame.