simuvac
10-04-2007, 07:15 PM
Strangely, the "security missteps" must remain classified until all of the 9/11 victims trials are over. So, they don't actually "reveal" anything to the public.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071004/METRO/110040038/1004&template=printart
9/11 suit reveals security missteps
October 4, 2007
By Stephen Manning - (AP) — Attorneys for the families of five persons killed in the September 11, 2001, attacks said yesterday that their negligence lawsuit yielded new information about what they think were security lapses that allowed terrorists to board and hijack planes.
The families filed the suit in 2003 against the airline industry and airport security companies. A settlement was announced yesterday at the National Press Club.
The suit involved the relatives of four persons who died in the Pentagon and one killed at the World Trade Center in New York. The families were not among those who tapped the September 11 victims' compensation fund, which was created by Congress to protect airlines from litigation.
"We do feel we have the answers we sought," said Julia Shontere, mother of Angela Houtz, 27, a La Plata, Md., resident who worked in the office of naval intelligence at the Pentagon.
Details of the settlement were not released. It must be approved by U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York.
The families refused money from the Victim Compensation Fund, which was created by Congress to protect airlines from a barrage of litigation after the attacks, so they could pursue the lawsuit.
"I felt like I was being lumped with everyone else by going with the fund," said Christine K. Fisher of Potomac, whose husband, Gerald "Geep" Fisher, 57, a Booz Allen Hamilton employee, was killed in the Pentagon. "We wanted answers that were not being provided."
Mrs. Fisher told the Baltimore Sun that she and her stepchildren feared that the money they would have received from the fund would have been reduced by her husband's age and the fact that he had life insurance.
"We felt that were we being unfairly penalized because he had planned ahead for the future," Mrs. Fisher said.
Mrs. Fisher and the others filed a lawsuit in 2003 charging American Airlines, Boeing and Argenbright Security Inc., a contractor responsible for screening passengers on the hijacked flights, with negligence.
Along with Miss Houtz and Mr. Fisher, the Pentagon victims were Ronald Golinski and Ernest Willcher. The family of Sigrid Wiswe, killed in the World Trade Center, settled their case with the airlines but not with the building's owners.
Most information from depositions of security officials, corporate records and other documents is sealed while other September 11 lawsuits remain in court. Keith Franz, an attorney for the five who settled, said 17 of 94 original lawsuits are still open, with the first scheduled for trial next month.
While the narrative of the attacks in Washington and New York has been told in great detail, Mr. Franz said there were still elements that have not been made public. That includes mistakes by screeners that allowed hijackers to pass security and decisions by airlines and security companies that made the screening system prone to errors.
"We wanted to know what happened that day at the checkpoints, in the aircraft and at the headquarters of the corporations," Mr. Franz said.
The lawsuits also probed the airport security issue more deeply than law-enforcement agencies such as the FBI, said Donald Migliori, an attorney for other September 11 plaintiffs. The lawsuits included lengthy depositions with dozens of airport screeners on duty that day.
A spokesman for American Airlines, whose plane crashed into the Pentagon, said the company is "committed to working with families toward settlement."
Joe Wayland, an attorney for Argenbright Security Inc., the company that provided screeners at Dulles International Airport, said all defendants in the lawsuits are "sympathetic" to the families and willing to settle cases.
"None of the defendants believe anybody other than the terrorists are responsible for the 9/11 attacks," Mr. Wayland said.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071004/METRO/110040038/1004&template=printart
9/11 suit reveals security missteps
October 4, 2007
By Stephen Manning - (AP) — Attorneys for the families of five persons killed in the September 11, 2001, attacks said yesterday that their negligence lawsuit yielded new information about what they think were security lapses that allowed terrorists to board and hijack planes.
The families filed the suit in 2003 against the airline industry and airport security companies. A settlement was announced yesterday at the National Press Club.
The suit involved the relatives of four persons who died in the Pentagon and one killed at the World Trade Center in New York. The families were not among those who tapped the September 11 victims' compensation fund, which was created by Congress to protect airlines from litigation.
"We do feel we have the answers we sought," said Julia Shontere, mother of Angela Houtz, 27, a La Plata, Md., resident who worked in the office of naval intelligence at the Pentagon.
Details of the settlement were not released. It must be approved by U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York.
The families refused money from the Victim Compensation Fund, which was created by Congress to protect airlines from a barrage of litigation after the attacks, so they could pursue the lawsuit.
"I felt like I was being lumped with everyone else by going with the fund," said Christine K. Fisher of Potomac, whose husband, Gerald "Geep" Fisher, 57, a Booz Allen Hamilton employee, was killed in the Pentagon. "We wanted answers that were not being provided."
Mrs. Fisher told the Baltimore Sun that she and her stepchildren feared that the money they would have received from the fund would have been reduced by her husband's age and the fact that he had life insurance.
"We felt that were we being unfairly penalized because he had planned ahead for the future," Mrs. Fisher said.
Mrs. Fisher and the others filed a lawsuit in 2003 charging American Airlines, Boeing and Argenbright Security Inc., a contractor responsible for screening passengers on the hijacked flights, with negligence.
Along with Miss Houtz and Mr. Fisher, the Pentagon victims were Ronald Golinski and Ernest Willcher. The family of Sigrid Wiswe, killed in the World Trade Center, settled their case with the airlines but not with the building's owners.
Most information from depositions of security officials, corporate records and other documents is sealed while other September 11 lawsuits remain in court. Keith Franz, an attorney for the five who settled, said 17 of 94 original lawsuits are still open, with the first scheduled for trial next month.
While the narrative of the attacks in Washington and New York has been told in great detail, Mr. Franz said there were still elements that have not been made public. That includes mistakes by screeners that allowed hijackers to pass security and decisions by airlines and security companies that made the screening system prone to errors.
"We wanted to know what happened that day at the checkpoints, in the aircraft and at the headquarters of the corporations," Mr. Franz said.
The lawsuits also probed the airport security issue more deeply than law-enforcement agencies such as the FBI, said Donald Migliori, an attorney for other September 11 plaintiffs. The lawsuits included lengthy depositions with dozens of airport screeners on duty that day.
A spokesman for American Airlines, whose plane crashed into the Pentagon, said the company is "committed to working with families toward settlement."
Joe Wayland, an attorney for Argenbright Security Inc., the company that provided screeners at Dulles International Airport, said all defendants in the lawsuits are "sympathetic" to the families and willing to settle cases.
"None of the defendants believe anybody other than the terrorists are responsible for the 9/11 attacks," Mr. Wayland said.