PDA

View Full Version : Why Americans Refuse To Believe the 9/11 Evidence!!!



Gold9472
04-24-2005, 01:40 AM
Why Americans Refuse to Believe the 9/11 Evidence!!!

Analysis by TvNewsLIES.org
April, 2005

Couldn't decide whether this should be filed in the Fear or Movement section, because as a good vernacular statement of our dilemma as a nation and a movement it belongs in both. - Ed.

The attacks of 9/11 were so unthinkable that most Americans would refuse to believe the complicity of their own government, even if presented with a mountain of evidence.

Very simply, it is possible to escape blame if you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do. PROLOGUE

When I was 11 years old I sat next to my friend and fellow class clown Jeffery, quietly thinking of ways to torture the unsuspecting substitute teacher. Jeffery and I were competing comedians, always trying to "get over" on each other in school. Jeffery was good and there were no limits to what he would do.

On this particular day we sat next to each other, sharing one of the double desks with which Brooklyn school children of the 70’s were so familiar. As our unsuspecting substitute turned his back to write something on the black board, Jeffery raised his arm and launched all his own books across the room in the direction opposite from where I was seated, immediately turning towards me with a look of horror and shock plastered on his face. The teacher, alarmed by the noise of the book launching, spun around only to see Jeffery's books scattered around the room. His loose leaf binder had opened up and produced an explosion of confetti in the form of notes and homework sheets.

A quick glance our way by the teacher brought into view a shocked Jeffery, who appeared to be the victim, sitting right next to me and staring at me with an expression of, "What the hell did you just do?" splashed on his face. I sat there, speechless, as the person on the right side of Jeffery's books prior to their launch to the left. I had nothing to say because the truth was simply not believable and no convincing lie presented itself.

Anyone witnessing this scene from the teacher’s vantage point could only come to one conclusion, Jesse did it. Even if I tried to explain that Jeffery launched the books, who would believe me? After all, who would have done this to his own property? Jeffery would have to spend the next hour or so reassembling his loose leaf binder. There is no way he would have done this to himself. No way, except for one thing...he did do this to himself, his motive...comedy. I was the patsy for two good reasons. First, I was sitting right there when it happened’ and second - I had a history of being a clown. I understood why people thought I was guilty and let me be the first to commend Jeffery for executing the perfect crime. He did the unthinkable and set up a patsy with his convincing claim of innocence.

In this sad, but true story, I was kicked out of the class by our substitute teacher. I was only 11 years old but I knew enough to understand that there was no way in hell that anyone would believe me if I told the truth and said that Jeffery was guilty of tossing his books . And so, having no proof that I was blameless, I swallowed my defeat and walked out of the room wondering what form my revenge against Jeffery would take.

The point to be made is this: sometimes, the more outrageous an action, the easier it is to get away with. Sometimes, there is no way that people can connect the criminal with the crime: the very idea of guilt is so far out of the norm as to be unthinkable.

Very simply, it is possible to escape blame if you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do. If the deed is egregious enough, even if some proof of your culpability surfaces, you’ll be on safe ground. If people cannot imagine your involvement in an unthinkable action, they will simply not believe you could possible be complicit in its commission. Think about it.

THE ART OF DENIAL

Flashback to a heinous crime of the recent past: When Susan Smith appeared before the public to beg the kidnapper of her children to return them to her, the nation cried with her. Her description of the guilty assailant was so very believable. It fit right into the criminal stereotype that had been etched into the psyche of Americans by the corporate media. And for a few very long days, everyone believed her.

But there was one huge problem with her story. It was Susan Smith, herself, who killed her children. Yes, the unbelievable was true. A young mother had actually allowed her own children to drown. It was inconceivable. It just couldn’t be. But it was.

Susan Smith had tried to throw the blame for her crime to a reasonable patsy. Had her story gone unchallenged, she might have gotten away with it. As it was, her crime fell apart because there was an effective investigation. Smith had no way of curtailing or controlling the inquiry into her crime. And as a result, justice was done, and Susan Smith was eventually charged and convicted of murder.

Truth and reality often can be totally unbelievable. It is very possible for people to totally deny assertions presented to them, even when provided with very credible of evidence that corroborates what they are told. A perfect example of such denial occurred when eye witness accounts of the Holocaust began coming out of war torn Europe. The unimaginable horror of what was being reported was simply too terrible to believe. It was easier to deal with the information as some sort of exaggeration and overreaction. Humans simply could not do this to other humans.

Think about what we know about acts of genocide in the Congo or Rwanda or Darfur? The art of denial is a well honed form of human self protection. Sometimes it is far easier to close one’s eyes to the truth than to acknowledge what is very painful. Think about that as well.

9/11 AND AMERICAN DENIAL

In this post 9/11 era, most Americans are unable even to consider the possibility of US government complicity in the attacks on our nation even when confronted with a mountain of evidence. In contrast, many of these same people accept far less believable scenarios simply on the basis of faith and without a single shred of evidence such as believing in the existence of a God. Tragically, they seem to have the exact same blind trust in the Bush administration.

At close inspection, the official version of 9/11 is outrageously full of holes. When those of us who are knowledgeable discuss the evidence that has unearthed about that day, there is so much to reveal that we don’t know where to start or where to stop. When tapped for what we know, we have so much to expose that the torrent of information that rushes can sound like the meaningless rant of a lunatic. Regardless of how credible or tangible the evidence, when rolled out in front of the public, it often sounds too far fetched or irrational to believe.

The facts that have come out about 9/11 differ so greatly from the official story that they almost defy validity. On the contrary, the official version is so simple as to be perfectly believable. It places the entire blame on the work of a handful of terrorists who hated us for our freedom. Case closed.

It is important to keep in mind that the 9/11 issue is not simply a question of whose version of a story is correct. This is a case in which millions of people would be taking a great risk. They would have to consider that the very government they have trusted and supported for more than four years may have participated in an unthinkable atrocity. That, in itself, may be impossible. By opening their minds to an objective examination of what has been discovered about the 9/11 attacks, millions of Americans would have to abandon their blind faith in this administration, and reject the mistaken belief that those in charge of our nation can do no wrong. That, too, may be impossible.

Herein lies the paradox. If the American people want truth they must acknowledge that they have been deceived. If that were to happen, and if they were to accept the facts that have been uncovered by the independent 9/11 research community, their faith in their government would be irreparably destroyed. In the long run, it is far easier to maintain one’s faith in a deceptive government than to deal with the painful details of that deception.

The consequence of such denial is that people end up believing what they must, rather than what is true. As time passes, they totally erase the distinction between fact and fiction in order to believe in their government, and they find themselves living in the America of 2005.

They greater tragedy of course, is the nature of the deception that has been accepted. There are lies, and there are lies. There are deceptions, and there are horrendous deceptions that alter history. .It is one thing for Jeffery to have gone unpunished for throwing his own books around so he could claim the crown of class clown. Thirty years after the fact, our mutual friends now believe the truth, and we can laugh at what went on.

It would have been another thing altogether to have allowed Jeffery to perpetrate a Columbine-like massacre to claim that same crown. There is no way that could have resulted in denial, and there is no way that any one would have dared to laugh.

BOTTOM LINE

Ironically, it’s almost funny when the fact-based 9/11 research community gathers to discuss the events of that day. The official government version of what happened loses so much credibility in the light of the available facts, films, testimony & chronicled history that it is almost impossible not to laugh in disbelief when we start to share what we know. The evidence that has been amassed is so persuasive as to rip the official version of 9/11 to shreds. And still, there is no one but ourselves to hear us.

We go on and on and on like people obsessed because as responsible citizens of the world we have assigned ourselves the task of exposing the truth. But we also have to accept the obstacles we face. We must understand how and why people refuse to believe what we say despite all the evidence in our possession. To explain that phenomenon I think about my friend Jeffery and his book launch. He did something no one believed he could possibly have done. As a result, he carried it off.

The people who were responsible for the attacks of 9/11 did something so unbelievable that most people would not believe they did it, even if presented with conclusive evidence of their guilt. As a result, they also carried it off, and the evidence be damned.

In the end, there is always the comment by those who would discredit the research and the evidence that has been uncovered. The defenders of the official version of 9/11 inevitably ask how so many people could keep a secret. "Wouldn't someone have blown the whistle by now?" is the constant challenge by the champions of denial. How naïve they are.

At the higher levels of government the issue is no longer about secrecy, but about survival. The extent of the 9/11 crimes are so great that a very real scenario of self preservation has arisen. Exposing the truth about 9/11 would virtually mean the end of the United States of America as a viable power. If the good people in our government and in our intelligence community exposed the truth, America would never ever regain its credibility in the world. We would never again be respected or trusted. We would immediately relinquish our leadership position in the world and sink to the position of a rogue nation that had committed an unforgivable atrocity against its own people for political purposes. We would expose the huge betrayal of trust that has been developed and nurtured over our 230 year history as a nation.

The minute any ranking government official was charged with complicity in 9/11, this nation would be no more. We would never recover. The people who were involved in 9/11 know this. They know that there is more at stake than their exposure. They know that once they did what they did, they would never be held accountable. As I did with Jeffery, let me be the first to admit that these folks committed the perfect crime. Not in the sense that they would not be discovered, but in the sense they knew it would do more harm to the country to expose them than it would to play along with them.

The perpetrators of 9/11 knew they were they protected by the blind loyalty of the American people who would refuse to believe they could have been involved. But they had another ace in the hole as well. They knew that no one who cared for the nation would reveal the truth, for to seek justice would in essence bring down the nation.

Bottom line: the truth is out there, the evidence is real. But there are none so blind as those who will not see. Think about that, and weep for us all.

Good Doctor HST
04-24-2005, 10:16 AM
Just a super article. That's all I have to say.

Sandy
04-24-2005, 11:57 AM
I've been a true and loyal Republican since Ike. In 1992 I discovered what was behind the Bush 41 Administration's new concept of a new America. One World Government? Not in my lifetime! I became an instant Libertarian as did 7 million other Republicans.

I fought against Bush 43 being elected in 2000 and had a feeling of anxiety building that he would be working for his grand government under Jesus Christ. I've been involved in politics for 40 years at that time and had a feeling something really bad would come of this new President.

That morning of 911, my daughter from D.C. was on the phone and we both watched the first and second attack on the twin towers. I yelled out "You Son of a Bitch!" and my daughter asked me "who?" and I answered "G.W. Bush, who else?"

I knew in my heart that he was behing this attack and I set out to find it. I'm on a lot of discussion forums and eventually I came across "Crossing the Rubicon" and what I had feared was all laid out for me. I then read a lot of other books on this subject but the corker was the 911 Commission Report that left so many dots open and disconnected that I read through "Crossing the Rubicon" for the second time.

So here I am looking for any movement that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Bush Administration is, in fact, the culprit behind the deaths of 3000 people. Why? To get us into Iraq, of course!!!

I want it proven, folks and when it has been done, I will spend the rest of my years spreading the word.

Gold9472
04-24-2005, 12:09 PM
I've been a true and loyal Republican since Ike. In 1992 I discovered what was behind the Bush 41 Administration's new concept of a new America. One World Government? Not in my lifetime! I became an instant Libertarian as did 7 million other Republicans.

I fought against Bush 43 being elected in 2000 and had a feeling of anxiety building that he would be working for his grand government under Jesus Christ. I've been involved in politics for 40 years at that time and had a feeling something really bad would come of this new President.

That morning of 911, my daughter from D.C. was on the phone and we both watched the first and second attack on the twin towers. I yelled out "You Son of a Bitch!" and my daughter asked me "who?" and I answered "G.W. Bush, who else?"

I knew in my heart that he was behing this attack and I set out to find it. I'm on a lot of discussion forums and eventually I came across "Crossing the Rubicon" and what I had feared was all laid out for me. I then read a lot of other books on this subject but the corker was the 911 Commission Report that left so many dots open and disconnected that I read through "Crossing the Rubicon" for the second time.

So here I am looking for any movement that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Bush Administration is, in fact, the culprit behind the deaths of 3000 people. Why? To get us into Iraq, of course!!!

I want it proven, folks and when it has been done, I will spend the rest of my years spreading the word.

Thank you for sharing that... and welcome.

Gold9472
04-24-2005, 12:19 PM
If you have any questions Sandy, let me know... BTW.. I like your cats. ;)

Gold9472
04-24-2005, 12:21 PM
BTW Sandy... if you've read through Crossing The Rubicon, then you must know that we have enough evidence to re-open the investigation. Only through a THOROUGH investigation could we finally prove once and for all who the real culprit's were.

somebigguy
04-24-2005, 01:33 PM
If you have any questions Sandy, let me know... BTW.. I like your cats. ;)
Yes, I like them too. I've got 7 cats, 3 dogs myself. Welcome Sandy!!! Took me nearly 3 years to realize the truth, nice to see some of us aren't so gullible.

Gold9472
04-24-2005, 01:51 PM
Hey... this is a really good article.

danceyogamom
04-24-2005, 05:04 PM
Hey... this is a really good article.

indeed it is ...

Gold9472
12-03-2005, 03:27 PM
bump

Casey
12-05-2005, 01:50 AM
I also think that article is fantastic. I find that it's very true that seemingly intelligent people are afraid to admit that the facts surrounding 9/11 do not add up and I think it's strange that people do not want to listen to the possibility that there could be something more sinister involved in it. Why would they not want to be completely informed about something as important as this? But when I read your article, it occurred to me that I think that's probably true that if the facts do come out, people will no longer believe in the "America" we have always known and loved. People will no longer support our country because it would seem like a government controlled by maniacal murderers and who could be proud of that??? But the problem with being so afraid of the outcome of the truth regarding 9/11 coming out is that it could easily happen again and it could involve someone in one of our families. Plus, to live one's life in the dark is no life at all. We have to know the truth and we have a right to know the truth. But quite honestly, I sometimes wonder what is the solution...do we try to make changes in our US government or do we get the heck out of this corrupt government who would actually kill their own people in order to gain support for the invasion of another country? That's a question, BTW....it wasn't meant to be rhetorical.