BBC reports WTC 7 fell 23 minutes too soon Version 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter thumper
  • Start date Start date
Any idea what the officail rebuttal to this is? Or are they just ignoring it like they do everythig else?
 
wow, already moved to the trash bin. gotta love these left wing gate keepers.
 
dtravni said:
AuGmENTor - partial answer to your question regarding reply or rebuttal ... see

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html

Richard Porter (BBC World) furnishes reply. Judging from the comments, it is not well recieved.
Thanx. I am still reading... And getting madder and madder. I could see if there weren't another collapse. THAT would be a "mistake" or saying the WRONG building had collapsed. But to call the VERY building BEFORE it collapses, and your best answer is a MISTAKE. Gimme a fuckin break. I have to go get banned from that forum, if you'll excuse me....
 
what pisses me off more are these huge political forums like iidb that back up the offical fabe, no matter how egregous, who cow others into agreeing with them.
 
Oh yeah.... I see you lookin Neimad9. Can't WAIT to get your take on this one...
 
AuGmENTor said:
Oh yeah.... I see you lookin Neimad9. Can't WAIT to get your take on this one...
Where'd you go dood? You can run... But you can't hide. It will be right here waiting when you get back. Will you just quote Mr. Porter as your excuse? The suspense is KILLIN me...
 
Oh, so i guess he CAN hide. When did he go invisible? Cuz I saw him just a second ago...
Also, when the hell did you talk to Jon? He's been MIA all day (well from AIM anyway...)
 
I am not Invisible unless thats on by defalut.

What take about what? When did I ever say the BBC documentry was the truth? I recommended another one about how governments use fear to control populations. I also found inaccruacys in the Alex Jones Terrorstorm video. I also disagreed with the illuminati stuff but again I backed that up.

None of this is evidence of me 'explaining away' 9/11 debunking. I even said multiple times that there are many holes. I do not have to agree with you with everything for fear of incurring your wrath. That said I do not even think I disagree with you that much. So what exactly is your point?
 
Back
Top