PDA

View Full Version : MPAA can kiss my NC-17 ass



frindevil
04-19-2005, 11:20 PM
asshats:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/18/business/media/18ratings.html?ex=1271476800&en=fff4a420930c890c&ei=5090&partner=techdirt

Please Don't Call It a G-Rated Dispute

By PAMELA LICALZI O'CONNELL
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/spacer.gif
Published: April 18, 2005

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/dropcap/t.gifhe Motion Picture Association of America's ratings code - G, PG, PG-13, R and NC-17 - is so familiar that the initials are used in everyday conversation about subjects that have nothing to do with movies. But that doesn't mean that the association wants just anybody to use them.

Recently the association sent e-mail messages and letters to people who write online fan fiction, demanding that they stop tagging stories with the ratings. Fan fiction, which uses characters from popular TV shows, movies and novels in original stories, has used movie ratings for years as a way to help adults find stories with mature content and to steer children away from it. Too many children looking for Harry Potter stories were stumbling onto new and unexpected uses for wands.

"We have a right to go after people who use our trademarks without permission, big or small, whenever we find out about them," said John Feehery, executive vice president for the association. "Our ratings are not supposed to be ripped off."

Wendy Seltzer, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, argues that the association would have a point only if the fiction sites had claimed that association reviewers had rated the works. Using the ratings as a rough comparison is not a trademark infringement, she said: "It's like saying a beverage tastes like Coke."

Heidi Tandy, a lawyer who is also president of fictionalley.org (http://fictionalley.org/), an archive of Harry Potter fiction, added that ratings such as PG and R are not exclusive to the association, since they are used by some foreign film boards. Movie ratings are also used online to tag jokes and photos, so the association may have a difficult time stripping its ratings from the cultural vocabulary.

Nevertheless, the association's cease-and-desist letters have had a ripple effect, with many fan fiction sites switching to new ratings schemes. One fan fiction writer archly suggested a simple visual code: one bunny picture means no smut, two bunnies means smut ahead.

PAMELA LICALZI O'CONNELL

danceyogamom
04-19-2005, 11:35 PM
what-evah ...

they need to lighten up ...

or maybe we should start adding foot notes whenever the rating system is used.

laurabears
04-19-2005, 11:49 PM
You would think the MPAA would have better things to do . . . like making sure 6 year-olds aren't looking at porn!

Simply_sexy
04-20-2005, 12:37 AM
*raises eyebrows*