PDA

View Full Version : Al Gore: "I Would Have Heeded 9/11 Warnings"



Gold9472
11-29-2006, 01:28 PM
Gore: 'I would have heeded 9/11 warnings'

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Gore_I_would_have_heeded_911_1129.html

Published: Wednesday November 29, 2006

In an interview with GQ Magazine, former Vice President Al Gore - who many Democrats believe should have been determined the winner in the 2000 presidential election against George Bush which the Supreme Court eventually decided - maintained that he would have "heeded the warnings" before the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, although he added that "no one can say that the 9-11 attack wouldn’t have occurred whoever was president."

Gore was asked if there was "a part of you that felt a sense of relief that you weren’t in charge that day."

"You mean a sense of relief that I didn’t have to deal with it?" Gore responded. "Oh no. Not at all. Not for one second. Not for one second. Why would I? I mean, well first of all, it just didn’t occur to me to feel anything like that."

"What did occur to me was to feel what every American felt, the outrage and anger and righteous anger, and support for the President at a time of danger…" Gore continued. "And, honestly, I was focused on the reality of the situation. And I wasn’t president, so, you know, it wasn’t about me."

"Now, I do wish, now that we have some distance from the events, and we have all this knowledge about what this administration did do, I certainly feel that I wish that it had been handled differently, and I do wish that I had somehow been able to prevent some of the catastrophic mistakes that were made," Gore said.

Gore admitted that "it’s almost too easy to say, 'I would have heeded the warnings,'" but left little doubt that he thought the president hadn't done as much as he should have, when warned by the CIA that bin Laden was determined to attack the Unites States in the summer of 2001.

"In fact, I think I would have, I know I would have," Gore said. "We had several instances when the CIA’s alarm bells went off, and what we did when that happened was, we had emergency meetings and called everybody together and made sure that all systems were go and every agency was hitting on all cylinders, and we made them bring more information, and go into the second and third and fourth level of detail."

"It is inconceivable to me that Bush would read a warning as stark and as clear [voice angry now] as the one he received on August 6th of 2001, and, according to some of the new histories, he turned to the briefer and said, 'Well, you’ve covered your ass,'" Gore continued. "And never called a follow up meeting. Never made an inquiry. Never asked a single question. To this day, I don’t understand it."

Gore said that he thought it was "fair to say" that Bush "personally does in fact bear a measure of blame for not doing his job at a time when we really needed him to do his job."

The former Tennessee senator fretted that his words may be viewed as some "sort of cheap political game-playing" but insisted he would have acted more proactively than Bush.

"And you know, I’m even reluctant to talk about it in these terms because it’s so easy for people to hear this or read this as sort of cheap political game-playing," Gore said. "I understand how it could sound that way."

According to GQ, Gore "practically" began screaming when he spoke of the lack of "accountablity" by the Bush Administration.

"But dammit, whatever happened to the concept of accountability for catastrophic failure?" Gore said. "This administration has been by far the most incompetent, inept, and with more moral cowardice, and obsequiousness to their wealthy contributors, and obliviousness to the public interest of any administration in modern history, and probably in the entire history of the country!"

Chana3812
11-29-2006, 06:46 PM
You Tell 'Em - President Gore !!

werther
11-30-2006, 10:06 AM
alright heres what I don't get....

When you discuss the events of 9/11 to people and gradually get to the point that 9/11 was an inside job they always say " nah, our government wouldn't do that"! Well if people would simply take the time to look at all the events leading up to 9/11 you are left with really only two options
1. inside job
2. our government/military/entire infrastructure being composed of complete morons.

in the end I don't know which one I would rather except (objectively). However, truth isn't a choice. Of these two options by face value you one would have to agree that option one is the only plausable scenerio.

Thats why I can't understand these 'truth debunkers'. Option 2 does not give one a great sense of security. But as far as I can tell it is the only other option. I mean its right there throughout the entire 9/11 commission report -'the military NORAD, FAA failed because they are comprised of anemic dwarfs'. (I can't recall which page that is on) Of course as truthers and people that have heavily delved into the matter of 9/11 and the events leading up to it, we know that NORAD/FAA failures on not the only blunders, -the list goes on and on.

The question is 'which would you rather believe'. And either way heads should roll.