Keep Hologram And CGI Talk Off Of This Board

Gold9472

Gold9472

Tired...
Staff member
Call me a censor, fine. Call me a dick, fine. Call me a "gatekeeper", fine.

Keep it off of this board.
 
What's CGI?

And why are you being a dick like that? :)

I mean, some of the theories out there are far-fetched in my opinion but I still it is still better to let people express them.
 
You're talking about "Mini-Nukes" being used at the WTC? Where are the radiation victims?
 
Gold9472 said:
You're talking about "Mini-Nukes" being used at the WTC? Where are the radiation victims?
Click to expand...


I dont know, ask Rick Siegel
 
For a nuclear device to have gone off at WTC, there would have to be critical mass, and that didn't happen. It's simple physics.
 
Gold9472 said:
Call me a censor, fine. Call me a dick, fine. Call me a "gatekeeper", fine.

Keep it off of this board.
Click to expand...

What are we talkin about here, Gold?
 
AuGmENTor said:
What are we talkin about here, Gold?
Click to expand...

Theories that talk about no planes hitting either of the towers, and instead "Holograms" were used. That all of the video footage we saw that day was "fake", and instead was "CGI".
 
Oh gimme a fuckin break. Ya know, some of the shit I hear about this really does remind me just how many morons there are on the planet. But I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Thank you for making it so they can't voice it HERE. And who's the genius that stinks it was a tactical nuculear strike?
 
I'm giving Seigel a break w/ the mini nuke theory of his cuz he put that out before S. Jones educated us all about Thermate. I'm interested if Seigel would be willing to withdraw his theory about mininukes in favor of S. Jones' hypothesis about Thermate.

I also want to say how dissappointed I was w/ Jimmy Walters forwarding the hologram bullshit at the l.a. 9/11 conference.
 
the cancer spike could have a lot to do w/ the toxicins related to asbestos, heavy metals and other toxins released that day.
 
al uh looyah said:
the cancer spike could have a lot to do w/ the toxicins related to asbestos, heavy metals and other toxins released that day.
Click to expand...

Yep. Could be related to a lot of things. Soooooooooooo, we can't rule out tactical depleted uranium-spiked missile or bomb.

From the article: "We have nearly 35 of these cancers in the family of 50,000 Ground Zero workers. The odds of that occurring are one in hundreds of millions," Worby said.
 
al uh looyah said:
I'm giving Seigel a break w/ the mini nuke theory of his cuz he put that out before S. Jones educated us all about Thermate. I'm interested if Seigel would be willing to withdraw his theory about mininukes in favor of S. Jones' hypothesis about Thermate.

I also want to say how dissappointed I was w/ Jimmy Walters forwarding the hologram bullshit at the l.a. 9/11 conference.
Click to expand...


It doesn't have to be one or the other. You nuke the foundation infrastructure then use thermite on the upper floors. Remember there were reports of large-scale secondary and tertiary explosions on both buildings. Mainstream media reported that (CNN, FOX, et al.) These bigger explosions occurred minutes before the bldgs. came down at free fall speed.

btw, Walters is moving forward with that hologram "bullshit."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4ARQ6anxEA

I'll admit the theory is far fetched. I don't necessarily buy it. But I think somebody needs to explain to me where the fucking plane is in this movie:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=P8oZIYkoBfE&search=september%2011%20plane
 
by my watching that vid, it seems like we're watching the back side of the buildings from very far away so the planes were coming in from the other side from where the camera was, so it was obscured by the buildings, plus the camera operator was zoomed out, so its hard to see.

I'm not ruling out d.u. bunker busters or similar type nuke stuff, but it seems like a geiger counter would show increased radiation still in that area, have there been any geiger readings around ground zero in the last 5 years?
 
al uh looyah said:
by my watching that vid, it seems like we're watching the back side of the buildings from very far away so the planes were coming in from the other side from where the camera was, so it was obscured by the buildings, plus the camera operator was zoomed out, so its hard to see.

I'm not ruling out d.u. bunker busters or similar type nuke stuff, but it seems like a geiger counter would show increased radiation still in that area, have there been any geiger readings around ground zero in the last 5 years?
Click to expand...

"have there been any geiger readings around ground zero in the last 5 years?"

question of the day! Plus it might be worth researching what experimental bunker buster nukes have been developed in the last decade and what their effects are. In other words, it might have been explosive technology that the public has absolutely no information about.

"it seems like we're watching the back side of the buildings from very far away so the planes were coming in from the other side from where the camera was, so it was obscured by the buildings,"

That's what I was thinking. All the same it is worth researching to find out the angle from where that video is shot, just to be certain that the projectile that hits the bldg hits on the side opposite of the cameraman.

Other points.

According to most accounts, the plane dropped into the scene, did a swooping turn, then hit the bldg. So yeah, maybe part of the plane's path was obscured by the bldg., but what about the entire path of the plane?

What I'm saying is, the "bldg obscuring the plane" is the only explanation we've got. I mean we see absolutely no plane. The camera man does not say, now remember that plane we just saw fly overhead. In fact, neither he nor the person he is with discuss seeing a plane. They state the opposite, saying they've seen no plane.

On that same note:

You have the cameraman, at the moment it happens, saying, that it was "fast," that it was "a missile." The person (female) he was with says "but that wasn't a plane," and he confirms, "nope," not a plane.

This is important because they are on the scene. Nobody says, "hey you two dunces, remember that plane we saw a minute ago. The one that flew over the river real low and made a turn." No, instead they immediately rule out a plane.

This meshes with other eyewitness accounts from the day that claim to have witnessed a missile.

Of course, just like with the Walker films, we have to be careful not to simply decide that the films are authentic. But no harm in discussing them.

Or maybe there is. So get your comment posted quick before Jon kills this thread.
 
Nah, I try to stay open to different points of view, but that is bullshit. Unless holographic technology is advanced way beyond anything we've been lead to believe (a distinct possibility) I just don't think this is logistically possible. As far as I'll go is remotely operated planes with DU payloads. Shit like this really gets peoples imaginations going.
 
AuGmENTor said:
Nah, I try to stay open to different points of view, but that is bullshit. Unless holographic technology is advanced way beyond anything we've been lead to believe (a distinct possibility) I just don't think this is logistically possible. As far as I'll go is remotely operated planes with DU payloads. Shit like this really gets peoples imaginations going.
Click to expand...

"Unless holographic technology is advanced way beyond anything we've been lead to believe"

That's an important disclaimer. Remember the DOD gets all the cool technology shit at least a decade before the public is aware of it. Most of the toys they are developing now would blow the minds of John D. Public. Space age sci fi shit. Silicon computer chips fused with live brain cells. Humanoid technology, flesh and metal portals that can be inserted into the skull and through which brains can be fed data; this after they've decoded human thought. Anyone who thinks the Pentagon didn't have 3-D surveillance of its grounds and surrounding airspace outwards to more than 100 miles is brainwashed. Long ago they've mated Promis software with artificial intelligence. You mate that AI Promis progeny with a Flight Termination System with a back door and, shit man, it's conceivable that much of what happened on 9/11 involved very few people and a couple of high-powered computers.

So no, man, without extensively researching it I wouldn't rule out any technology, including 3-D hologram projectors operated from remote-controlled helicopters or what-the-hell-ever else one can conceive of. If it's out there, DOD has it and the private contractors that own DOD have it.

And that probably includes mutant super-disease strains, tailor-made small-scale nukes, some sick robotic/humanoid shit, on and on.
 
Yeah it is progressing at a sickening rate. But without factual knowledge of exactly where the technology is, I'll stick with ideas based in the real. You do raise a good point though, and I will keep an eye open. I mean, this is all about keeping an open mind, no?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top